Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;63(4):512-521.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.017. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Epistemic Beliefs: Relationship to Future Expectancies and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients

Affiliations

Epistemic Beliefs: Relationship to Future Expectancies and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients

Paul K J Han et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Expectations about the future (future expectancies) are important determinants of psychological well-being among cancer patients, but the strategies patients use to maintain positive and cope with negative expectancies are incompletely understood.

Objectives: To obtain preliminary evidence on the potential role of one strategy for managing future expectancies: the adoption of "epistemic beliefs" in fundamental limits to medical knowledge.

Methods: A sample of 1307 primarily advanced-stage cancer patients participating in a genomic tumor testing study in community oncology practices completed measures of epistemic beliefs, positive future expectancies, and mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Descriptive and linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationships between these factors and test two hypotheses: 1) epistemic beliefs affirming fundamental limits to medical knowledge ("fallibilistic epistemic beliefs") are associated with positive future expectancies and mental HRQOL, and 2) positive future expectancies mediate this association.

Results: Participants reported relatively high beliefs in limits to medical knowledge (M = 2.94, s.d.=.67) and positive future expectancies (M = 3.01, s.d.=.62) (range 0-4), and relatively low mental and physical HRQOL. Consistent with hypotheses, fallibilistic epistemic beliefs were associated with positive future expectancies (b = 0.11, SE=.03, P< 0.001) and greater mental HRQOL (b = 0.99, SE=.34, P = 0.004); positive expectancies also mediated the association between epistemic beliefs and mental HRQOL (Sobel Z=4.27, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Epistemic beliefs in limits to medical knowledge are associated with positive future expectancies and greater mental HRQOL; positive expectancies mediate the association between epistemic beliefs and HRQOL. More research is needed to confirm these relationships and elucidate their causal mechanisms.

Keywords: Epistemic beliefs; coping; positive expectancies; prognosis; quality of life; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Associations between epistemic beliefs, hope, and mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL). a, b, and c represent regression coefficients for the associations between epistemic beliefs, hope, and mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL); c’ represents the regression coefficient for the association between epistemic beliefs and mental HRQOL, adjusting for hope (total effect). ns = non-significant.

References

    1. Oettingen G, Mayer D. The motivating function of thinking about the future: expectations versus fantasies. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002;83:1198–1212. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher MW, Lopez SJ. Positive expectancies and mental health: Identifying the unique contributions of hope and optimism. J Positive Psychol 2009;4:548–556.
    1. Scheier M, Carver CS. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol 1985;4:219–247. - PubMed
    1. Scheier M, Carver CS. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update. Cog Ther Res 1992;16:201–228.
    1. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Segerstrom SC. Optimism. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:879–889. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types