Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 24;16(1):242.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01969-1.

Vertebral body and splenic irradiation are associated with lymphopenia in localized pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

Affiliations

Vertebral body and splenic irradiation are associated with lymphopenia in localized pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

Abhinav V Reddy et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine if vertebral body and splenic dosimetry was associated with the development of lymphopenia in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods: Patients with BRPC/LAPC who were treated with SBRT and who had lymphocyte counts and radiation treatment plans available for review were included in the study. Vertebral body levels T11-L3 and the spleen were retrospectively contoured for each patient. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify associations between vertebral body and splenic dosimetric parameters with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to identify dose-volume thresholds in predicting grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia.

Results: A total of 132 patients were included in the study. On UVA and MVA, vertebral V15 (regression coefficient [β]: - 0.026, 95% CI - 0.044 to - 0.009, p = 0.003), vertebral V2.5 (β: - 0.011, 95% CI - 0.020 to - 0.002, p = 0.015), and log10PTV (β: - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.005, p = 0.042) were associated with post-SBRT ALC. On UVA and MVA, vertebral V15 (odds ratio [OR]: 3.98, 95% CI 1.09-14.51, p = 0.027), vertebral V2.5 (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.09, p = 0.032), and spleen V10 (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.09-1.95, p = 0.004) were associated with development of grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia. Development of grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia was more likely in patients with vertebral V15 ≥ 5.84% (65.5% vs 34.0%, p = 0.002), vertebral V2.5 ≥ 48.36% (48.9% vs 23.8%, p = 0.005), and spleen V10 ≥ 4.17% (56.2% vs 26.9%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Increasing radiation dose to vertebral bodies and spleen were associated with the development of lymphopenia in BRPC/LAPC treated with SBRT. Optimization of vertebral body and splenic dosimetry may reduce the risk of developing lymphopenia and improve clinical outcomes in this population.

Keywords: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Pancreatic cancer; Radiation induced lymphopenia; SBRT; Spleen dose; Splenic irradiation; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Vertebral body dose; Vertebral body irradiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JMH is former employee of PANCAN and current employee of 1440 Foundation. No other conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic curves showing optimal thresholds for vertebral V15 (a), vertebral V2.5 (b), and spleen V10 (c) in predicting development of grade ≥ 2 lymphopenia
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiation treatment plan with isodose lines on axial, coronal, and sagittal planning images for a initial plan which exceeded vertebral body and splenic thresholds and b optimized plan which met vertebral body and splenic constraints. Turquoise colorwash represents PTV, orange colorwash represents spleen, and red colorwash represents vertebral bodies. Isocenter represented by green crosshair on axial image
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dose-volume histograms for a vertebral body and b spleen for the initial (solid line) and optimized (dashed line) plans

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Version 2.2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic_blocks.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2021.
    1. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 2019;10:10–27. doi: 10.14740/wjon1166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campian JL, Ye X, Brock M, et al. Treatment-related lymphopenia in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Investig. 2013;31:183–188. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2013.767342. - DOI - PMC - PubMed