Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;57(2):245-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.10.035. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

Management of post appendicectomy intra-abdominal collections: A volumetric cut off for drainage?

Affiliations

Management of post appendicectomy intra-abdominal collections: A volumetric cut off for drainage?

Georgina M Bough et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal collections (IAC) are a common complication following appendicectomy, one of the most commonly performed emergency abdominal procedures in childhood. The option to drain a collection is frequently available but not always required.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of medically and procedurally-managed post appendicectomy IACs and suggest a method of standardising the need for intervention.

Methods: A single centre, retrospective review of children aged ≤ 16 years presenting between 2014 and 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, management, and outcome data were collected. IAC volume and surface area were calculated assuming a prolate spheroid or true ellipsoid depending on the number of dimensions reported.

Results: 60 patients (18%) of 334 patients developed an IAC post appendicectomy. Medical management was undertaken in 44 (73%), drainage in 12 (20%), and surgical washout in 4 (7%). Collection size was associated with failure of medical management: maximum diameter (p = 0.028), volume (p = 0.002), and surface area (p = 0.001). Collections with a volume of 2 ml/kg were significantly less likely to fail medical management than larger collections (0/33 vs 6/11; p < 0.0001).

Discussion: Not all post appendicectomy IACs require drainage. The relationship between collection volume and need for drainage is more closely assessed using a volume calculation rather than a single dimension measurement, particularly when adjusted for weight of the child. A cut off of 2 ml/kg appears to be a good objective measure for intervention and provides a communication tool for discussion amongst the multidisciplinary team. Prospectively collected multicentre data on this subject would be timely.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Appendicectomy; Appendicitis; Collection; Complications; Intra-abdominal.

PubMed Disclaimer