Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;25(2):697-711.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13417. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial

Affiliations

Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial

Holly Etchegary et al. Health Expect. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Engaging with patients about their lived experience of health and illness and their experience within the healthcare system can help inform the provision of care, health policies and health research. In the context of health research, however, operationalizing the levels of patient engagement is not straightforward. We suggest that a key challenge to the routine inclusion of patients as partners in health research is a lack of tangible guidance regarding how this can be accomplished.

Methods: In this article, we provide guidance on how to codesign and operationalize a concrete patient engagement plan for any health research project.

Results: We illustrate a seven-step approach using the example of a national clinical trial in Canada and provide a patient engagement planning template for use in any health research project.

Conclusion: Such concrete guidance should improve the design and reporting of patient engagement in health research.

Patient or public contribution: The De-Implementing Wisely Research group is informed by a national 9-member patient partner council (PPC). The research team includes three lead patient partners who are coinvestigators on the grant that funds the program of research. Members of the council advise on all aspects of the study design and implementation. The ideas presented in this paper were informed by regular communication and planning with the PPC; specific contributions of lead patient partner authors are outlined as follows: Brian Johnston, Susan Goold and Vanessa Francis are patient partners with a wide breadth of experience in the healthcare system and health research projects. The guidance in this article draws on their lived and professional expertise. All patient partner authors contributed to the planning of the manuscript, participated in meetings to develop content and provided critical manuscript edits and comments on drafts.

Keywords: levels of engagement; patient engagement; patient-oriented research; planning tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The research‐modified International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) spectrum. Source: Publicly available online by Gabriele Bammer, https://i2insights.org/2020/01/07/research-modified-iap2-spectrum/
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient engagement planning tool template
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient engagement planning tool template

References

    1. Shippee N, Domecq J, Prutsky L, Wang Z, Elraiyah T, Nabhan M. Patient and service user engagement in health research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18:1151‐1166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton CB, Hoens AM, Backman CL, et al. An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful engagement in research. Health Expect. 2018;21:396‐406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirwan JR, de Wit M, Frank L, et al. Emerging guidelines for patient engagement in research. Value Health. 2016;20:481‐486. - PubMed
    1. Howe A, Mathie E, Munday D, et al. Learning to work together—lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manafo E, Petermann L, Mason Lai P, Vandall Walker V. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Policy Ser. 2018;16(1):5. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources