Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;54(3):230-238.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Factors Influencing the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake of Caregivers of Adolescents in Appalachia

Affiliations

Factors Influencing the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake of Caregivers of Adolescents in Appalachia

Kathleen J Porter et al. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors that influence the sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake of caregivers of middle school-aged adolescents.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Southwestern Virginia, US, part of Central Appalachia.

Participants: Caregivers (n = 362) of adolescents enrolled in the Kids SIPsmartER trial. Participants were mostly female (91%) and non-Hispanic White (96%), and 21% received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

Main outcome measures: Caregiver daily SSB intake and demographics, personal-level, interpersonal-level, and environmental-level determinants.

Analysis: Descriptive statistics, 1-way ANOVA, and stepwise regression.

Results: On average, caregivers consumed 25.7 (SD, 33.2) fluid ounces of SSB per day. In the final model, which included all variables, age (β = -0.41; P < 0.05), receiving SNAP benefits (β = 14.19; P ≤ 0.01), behavioral intentions (β = -5.48; P ≤ 0.001), affective attitudes (β = -2.15, P < 0.05), perceptions of whether their adolescent frequently consumes high amounts of SSB (β = 1.92; P ≤ 0.001), and home availability (β = 7.43; P ≤ 0.01) were significantly associated with SSB intake.

Conclusions and implications: Caregivers of Appalachian middle school students are high SSB consumers. Findings highlight the importance of implementing behavioral interventions for caregivers of adolescents that target multiple levels of influence, including demographic, personal-level, interpersonal-level, and environmental-level factors. Interventions may be particularly important for communities and groups with higher SSB intakes, such as those in Appalachia and who receive SNAP benefits.

Keywords: parents; rural Appalachia; socioecological model; sugar-sweetened beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hedrick VE, Savla J, Comber DL, et al. Development of a brief questionnaire to assess habitual beverage intake (BEVQ-15): sugar-sweetened beverages and total beverage energy intake. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112:840–849. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kit BK, Fakhouri TH, Park S, Nielsen SJ, Ogden CL. Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:180–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imoisili O, Park S, Lundeen EA, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage intake among adults, by residence in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties in 12 states and the District of Columbia, 2017. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17: E07. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lundeen EA, Park S, Pan L, Blanck HM. Daily intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among us adults in 9 states, by state and sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics, 2016. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. von Philipsborn P, Stratil JM, Burns J, et al. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6:CD012292. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types