Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):204-210.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000958.

Technical advances in nerve-sparing and continence preservation

Adriana M Pedraza  1 , Vinayak Wagaskar, Sneha Parekh, Ashutosh Tewari
Affiliations
Review

Technical advances in nerve-sparing and continence preservation

Adriana M Pedraza et al. Curr Opin Urol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are common after radical prostatectomy. These side effects greatly impact patients' quality of life. Therefore, surgical techniques and technology tools are constantly being developed to optimize trifecta outcomes. Here we focus on advances in nerve-sparing (NS) and continence preservation.

Recent findings: New surgical techniques dedicated to preservation rather than reconstruction have been developed to improve urinary continence (UC) and NS. On the other hand, intraoperative assessment of prostatic and periprostatic structures has shown promising outcomes toward NS whereas avoiding omission of extracapsular extension (ECE). Likewise, neural regeneration strategies are under research to improve return of erectile function and UC.

Summary: Superb outcomes after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy require a proper balance between NS and risk of ECE. Detailed anatomic knowledge together with an accurate surgical planning are cornerstone for tailoring the approach in each case.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128:492–497.
    1. Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: Importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006; 98:314–323.
    1. Takenaka A, Tewari AK. Anatomical basis for carrying out a state-of-the-art radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2012; 19:7–19.
    1. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: A risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011; 108 (6 B):984–992.
    1. Martini A, Gupta A, Cumarasamy S, et al. Novel nomogram for the prediction of seminal vesicle invasion including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Urol 2019; 26:458–464.