Outcomes After Independent Trainee Versus Consultant-led Emergency Laparotomy: Inverse Propensity Score Population Dataset Analysis
- PMID: 34954757
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005352
Outcomes After Independent Trainee Versus Consultant-led Emergency Laparotomy: Inverse Propensity Score Population Dataset Analysis
Abstract
Objective: We utilized a population dataset to compare outcomes for patients where surgery was independently performed by trainees to cases led by a consultant.
Summary of background data: Emergency laparotomy is a common, high-risk, procedure. Although trainee involvement to improve future surgeons' experience and ability in the management of such cases is crucial, some studies have suggested this is to the detriment of patient outcomes. In the UK, appropriately skilled trainees may be entrusted to perform emergency laparotomy without supervision of a consultant (attending).
Methods: Patients who underwent emergency laparotomy between 2013 and 2018 were identified from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit of England and Wales. To reduce selection and confounding bias, the inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used, allowing robust comparison of trainee-led and consultant-led laparotomy cases accounting for eighteen variables, including details of patient, treatment, pathology, and preoperative mortality risk. Groups were compared for mortality and length of stay.
Results: A total of 111,583 patients were included in the study. The operating surgeon was a consultant in 103,462 cases (92.7%) and atrainee in 8121 cases (7.3%). Mortality at discharge was 11.6%. Trainees were less likely to operate on high-risk and colorectal cases. After weighting, mortality (12.2% vs 11.6%, P = 0.338) was equivalent between trainee- and consultant-led cases. Median length of stay was 11 (interquartile range 7, 19) versus 11 (7, 20) days ( P = 0.004), respectively. Trainee-led operations reported fewer cases of blood loss >500mL (9.1% vs 11.1%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Major laparotomy maybe safely entrusted to appropriately skilled trainees without impacting patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
The intersection of patient outcomes and trainee autonomy.Surgery. 2022 Sep;172(3):1033. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 May 18. Surgery. 2022. PMID: 35595566 No abstract available.
References
-
- Porta CR, Sebesta JA, Brown TA, et al. Training surgeons and the informed consent process: routine disclosure of trainee participation and its effect on patient willingness and consent rates. Arch Surg. 2012;147:57–62.
-
- Nguyen TN, Silver D, Arthurs B. Consent to cataract surgery performed by residents. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40:34–37.
-
- Moodie JJ, Masood I, Tint N, et al. Patients’ attitudes towards trainee surgeons performing cataract surgery at a teaching hospital. Eye. 2008;22:1183–1186.
-
- Wu N, Weltz AS, Sibia US, et al. Trainee involvement does not adversely impact clinical outcomes for laparoscopic foregut surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:S184–S185.
-
- Ramsingh J, Truran P, Bliss R. A systematic review of trainee involvement in thyroid surgery and the impact on patient outcomes. Ann Thyroid. 2020;5:2–12.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
