Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;164(2):362-369.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.018. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Post-recurrence survival in patients with cervical cancer

Affiliations

Post-recurrence survival in patients with cervical cancer

David Cibula et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Up to 26% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer experience relapse after primary surgery. However, little is known about which factors influence prognosis following disease recurrence. Therefore, our aims were to determine post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) and to identify respective prognostic factors for PR-DSS.

Methods: Data from 528 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who relapsed after primary surgery performed between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the SCANN study (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer). Factors related to the primary disease and recurrence were combined in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict PR-DSS.

Results: The 5-year PR-DSS was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%-44.5%), median disease-free interval between primary surgery and recurrence (DFI1) was 1.5 years, and median survival after recurrence was 2.5 years. Six significant variables were identified in the multivariable analysis and were used to construct the prognostic model. Two were related to primary treatment (largest tumour size and lymphovascular space invasion) and four to recurrence (DFI1, age at recurrence, presence of symptoms, and recurrence type). The C-statistic after 10-fold cross-validation of prognostic model reached 0.701 (95% CI 0.675-0.727). Three risk-groups with significantly differing prognoses were identified, with 5-year PR-DSS rates of 81.8%, 44.6%, and 12.7%.

Conclusions: We developed the robust model of PR-DSS to stratify patients with relapsed cervical cancer according to risk profiles using six routinely recorded prognostic markers. The model can be utilised in clinical practice to aid decision-making on the strategy of recurrence management, and to better inform the patients.

Keywords: Early-stage cervical cancer; Multivariable model; Post-recurrence disease-specific survival; Prognosis; Recurrence; Risk profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Outside the submitted work, Dr. Abu-Rustum reports grants from Stryker/Novadaq and GRAIL (paid to the institution). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) after recurrence in all relapsed patients (N = 528). Time 0 represents the date of diagnosis of recurrence. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease-specific survival of recurring patients divided according to the following prognostic factors: (A) location of recurrence; (B) type of recurrence; (C) disease-free interval (DFI1) calculated as the time from primary surgery to the time when recurrence was diagnosed; (D) presence of symptoms at the time of recurrence diagnosis, where time 0 represents the time when recurrence was diagnosed; and (E) presence of symptoms at the time of recurrence, where time 0 represents the time of primary surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Post-recurrence disease-specific survival in patients stratified by the risk score (N = 528). Time 0 represents the time when recurrence was diagnosed.

References

    1. Wu ES, Jeronimo J, Feldman S. Barriers and Challenges to Treatment Alternatives for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in Lower-Resource Settings. Journal of global oncology. 2017;3:572–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elit L, Fyles AW, Devries MC, Oliver TK, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Gynecology Cancer Disease Site G. Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Gynecologic oncology. 2009;114:528–35. - PubMed
    1. Salani R, Khanna N, Frimer M, Bristow RE, Chen LM. An update on post-treatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommendations. Gynecologic oncology. 2017;146:3–10. - PubMed
    1. Cibula D, Potter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie-Meder C, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cervical Cancer. Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology. 2018;472:919–36. - PubMed
    1. Taarnhoj GA, Christensen IJ, Lajer H, Fuglsang K, Jeppesen MM, Kahr HS, et al. Risk of recurrence, prognosis, and follow-up for Danish women with cervical cancer in 2005–2013: A national cohort study. Cancer. 2018;124:943–51. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms