Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 8:12:786121.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.786121. eCollection 2021.

Effects of Dietary Bacillus and Non-starch Polysaccharase on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Associated Changes on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, and Serum Antioxidant Profiles in Ducks

Affiliations

Effects of Dietary Bacillus and Non-starch Polysaccharase on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Associated Changes on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, and Serum Antioxidant Profiles in Ducks

Simin Peng et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Given the desirable results of using probiotics and enzyme preparations as feed supplements in poultry health, here, the effects of Bacillus and Non-starch Polysaccharase (NSPase) on the growth performance, serum antioxidant profiles, and gut microbial communities of early stage ducks is investigated. A total of 400 Zhijiang ducks (of similar body weight and 1 day age) was selected and randomly divided into four groups. The feeding period was 28 days. Each group contained 10 replicates of 10 birds. Control group (I) was fed with basal diet, while treatment groups II to IV were fed, respectively, with 150 mg/kg NSPases, 25 mg/kg Bacillus probiotics, and 150 mg/kg NSPases + 25 mg/kg Bacillus probiotics in their basal diet. The results demonstrated that dietary Bacillus (25 mg/kg) increased average final weight, average daily gain (ADG), and decreased the malonaldehyde (MDA) in birds (P < 0.05). Dietary Bacillus (25 mg/kg) and NSPases + Bacillus (150 mg/kg + 25 mg/kg) presented much higher glutathione (GSH) and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in birds (P < 0.05). Additionally, as revealed by β-diversity indices and analysis of similarities, dietary NSPases + Bacillus could affect the ileum microbial abundances and diversities at the genera level (P < 0.05), but it had no effect on the caecal microbiota. Also, 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that dietary Bacillus and NSPases + Bacillus increased the populations of Ruminococcaceae genera in the cecum (P < 0.05), and S24-7_group and Lactobacillus genera in the ileum (P < 0.05). However, dietary NSPases and Bacillus alone and in combination could significantly decrease the content of Bacteroides in the ileum (P < 0.05). According to Spearman correlation analysis, 7 ilea bacterial microbiomes (S24-7 group, Lactobacillus, Subgroup 2, Subgroup 1, Kitasatospora, Candidatus Solibacter, and Akkermansia) were positively correlated with SOD (P < 0.05). In conclusion, Bacillus (25 mg/kg) and NSPases (150 mg/kg) included in the diet could efficiently enhance the growth performance by altered gut microbiota composition at the genera level and antioxidant indices of ducks.

Keywords: Bacillus; duck; growth performance; gut microbiota; intestinal morphology; non-starch polysaccharidase; serum antioxidant profiles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PCoA and NMDS analysis of cecum (A,B) and ileum (C,D) microbial community compositions based on information of operational taxonomic units (OTU).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Community structure of bacteria at genus level in the cecum of Zhijiang ducks. Histogram (A) of the top 10 genera in each group. Significant difference relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae (B) and vadinBB60_group (C) at the genera level. (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with control group).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Community structure of bacteria at genus level in the ileum of Zhijiang ducks. Histogram (A) of the top 10 genera in each group. Significant difference relative abundance of Bacteroides (B), S24-7_group (C), Lactobacillus (D), and Subgroup_2 (E) at the genera level. (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with the control group).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Heatmap of Spearman rank correlation between the cecal microbiota. (A) /ileum microbiota (B) and the measured parameters under different treatment. The genus with relative abundance in the top 10 are presented and the intensity of the colors performed the degree of association. Green, negative correlation; Red, positive correlation. AFW, average final weight; ADG, average daily weight gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; F/G, feed to gain ratio. MDA, malonaldehyde; GSH, glutathione; SOD, activities of superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; CAT, catalase. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.

References

    1. Alagawany M., Elnesr S. S., Farag M. R. (2018). The role of exogenous enzymes in promoting growth and improving nutrient digestibility in poultry. Iranian J. Vet. Res. 19:157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amerah A. M. (2015). Interactions between wheat characteristics and feed enzyme supplementation in broiler diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 199 1–9. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.09.012 - DOI
    1. Annison G., Choct M. (1991). Anti-nutritive activities of cereal non-starch polysaccharides in broiler diets and strategies minimizing their effects. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 47 232–242. 10.1079/wps19910019 - DOI
    1. Ao X., Meng Q. W., Yan L., Kim H. J., Hong S. M., Cho J. H., et al. (2010). Effects of non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on nutrient digestibility, growth performance and blood profiles of growing pigs fed a diet based on corn and soybean meal. Asian Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 23 1632–1638. 10.5713/ajas.2010.10123 - DOI
    1. Applegate T. J., Karcher D. M., Lilburn M. S. (2005). Comparative development of the small intestine in the turkey poult and Pekin duckling. Poult. Sci. 84 426–431. 10.1093/ps/84.3.426 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources