Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 10:11:789915.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.789915. eCollection 2021.

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells and PD-L1 Expression in Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Affiliations

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells and PD-L1 Expression in Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Xiangfei Sun et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Immunotherapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains a clinical challenge. The present study aimed to explore the clinical and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression in GISTs.

Methods: A total of 507 clinical tissue specimens of primary GISTs were collected for immunohistochemical analysis of immune cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression. Influencing factors of survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox regression model.

Results: There were significant differences in sex, tumor location, size, mitotic index, NIH risk grade, and cell morphology between different gene mutation types of GISTs. Immune cell infiltration in GISTs mainly involved macrophages and T cells. PD-1 was expressed in 48.5% of the tissue specimens, and PD-L1 expression was detected in 46.0% of the samples. PD-L1 expression was negatively correlated with the tumor size and mitotic index but positively correlated with the number of CD8+ T cells. There were significant differences in the number of CD8+ T cells between different gene mutation types. Wild type-mutant GISTs were enriched with CD8+ T cells as compared with KIT- and PDGFRA-mutant GISTs. The number of CD8+ T cells was higher in non-gastric GISTs. PD-L1 and CD8+ T cells were independent predictors for better relapse-free survival of GISTs.

Conclusions: PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker for better prognosis of GISTs. Non-gastric GIST patients with wild-type mutations may be the beneficiaries of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Keywords: PD-L1; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; prognosis; programmed cell death protein-1; programmed cell death protein-Ligand 1; tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The number of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in GISTs. HPF, high power field.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The number of CD8+ T cells in different gene mutation types of GISTs. (A) Wild-type mutated GISTs were enriched with CD8+ T cells as compared with KIT and PDGFRA mutated GISTs; (B, C) There was no significant difference in CD8+ T cell infiltration between the point mutation type, deletion mutation, insertion mutation, repeat mutation, and mixed mutation types or between the KIT exon 9, 11, 13, and 17 mutations. HPF, high-power field; ***P < 0.001; ns, no significance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier analysis of the relationships between clinicopathological features and recurrence-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). (A) GIST patients with the spindle cell type had a better RFS than those with epithelial and mixed cell; (B) There was no statistical difference in RFS between different mutation types; (C) RFS was significantly longer in patients with high PD-L1 expression than that in patients with low PD-L1 expression; (D) The increase of CD8+ T cells was significantly correlated with better RFS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rubin BP, Heinrich MC, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour. Lancet (2007) 369:1731–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60780-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ricci R, Dei TA, Rindi G. On the Prevalence of Kras Mutations in Gists. Virchows Arch (2013) 463:847. doi: 10.1007/s00428-013-1496-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ibrahim A, Chopra S. Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med (2020) 144:655–60. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0370-RS - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joensuu H, DeMatteo RP. The Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Model for Targeted and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Malignancy. Annu Rev Med (2012) 63:247–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-043010-091813 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janku F, Abdul RA, Chi P, Heinrich MC, von Mehren M, Jones RL, et al. . Switch Control Inhibition of Kit and Pdgfra in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Phase I Study of Ripretinib. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38:3294–303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00522 - DOI - PMC - PubMed