Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 8:11:801379.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.801379. eCollection 2021.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in the Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials

Affiliations
Review

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in the Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials

Muhammet Ozer et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

The prevalence of primary liver cancer is rapidly rising all around the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer. Unfortunately, the traditional treatment methods to cure HCC showed poor efficacy in patients who are not candidates for liver transplantation. Until recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were the front-line treatment for unresectable liver cancer. However, rapidly emerging new data has drastically changed the landscape of HCC treatment. The combination treatment of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (immunotherapy plus anti-VEGF) was shown to provide superior outcomes and has become the new standard first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic HCC. Currently, ongoing clinical trials with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have focused on assessing the benefit of antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte- associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) as monotherapies or combination therapies in patients with HCC. In this review, we briefly discuss the mechanisms underlying various novel immune checkpoint blockade therapies and combination modalities along with recent/ongoing clinical trials which may generate innovative new treatment approaches with potential new FDA approvals for HCC treatment in the near future.

Keywords: clinical trials; hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); immune checkpoint blockade; immunotherapy; liver cancer (LC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selected experimental immunotherapy treatment combination strategies for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy. Many small molecule drugs and other treatments are being tested in combination with standard immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapeutics; a graphical overview of a selection of these are shown here, being tested with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapies. Main figure depicts various treatment strategies on a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor, infiltrating cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs), and arterial-derived tumor-specific vasculature, divided into treatments being tested along with anti-PD-1 therapy (top, tested with either Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, or PDR001) or with anti-PD-L1 therapy (bottom, tested with Avelumab, Durvalumab or Atezolizumab). β-, electron emission radiation; CTL, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte; CTLA-4, cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HGFR, hepatocyte growth factor receptor; HLA-I, human leukocyte antigen class I; GITR, glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor related; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed cell death protein ligand 1; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; Pexa-Vec, pexastimogene devacirepvec; Ptd-L-Ser, phosphatidylserine; TACE, trans-arterial chemoembolization; TATE, trans-arterial tirapazamine embolization; TCF4J, transcription factor 4 J isoform; TCR, T-cell receptor; TGFβR, transforming growth factor β receptor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; Y90, yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llovet JM, Cucreux M, Lencioni R, Di Bisceglie AM, Galle PR, Dufour F. EASL-EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatol (2012) 56(4):908–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordan JD, Kennedy EB, Abou-Alfa GK, Beg MS, Brower ST, Gade TP, et al. . Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38(36):4317–45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.0.02672 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finn R, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle P, Ducreux M, Kim T, et al. . Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2020) 382(20):1894–905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang Y-H, Bodoky G, et al. . Regorafenib for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Progressed on Sorafenib Treatment (RESORCE): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet (2017) 389(10064):56–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9 - DOI - PubMed