Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Feb 1;322(2):E132-E140.
doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00337.2021. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

Duodenal mucosal resurfacing with a GLP-1 receptor agonist increases postprandial unconjugated bile acids in patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Observational Study

Duodenal mucosal resurfacing with a GLP-1 receptor agonist increases postprandial unconjugated bile acids in patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes

Suzanne Meiring et al. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a new endoscopic ablation technique aimed at improving glycemia and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DMR appears to improve insulin resistance, which is the root cause of T2DM, but its mechanism of action is largely unknown. Bile acids function as intestinal signaling molecules in glucose and energy metabolism via the activation of farnesoid X receptor and secondary signaling [e.g., via fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)], and are linked to metabolic health. We investigated the effect of DMR and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on postprandial bile acid responses in 16 patients with insulin-dependent T2DM, using mixed meal tests performed at the baseline and 6 mo after the DMR procedure. The combination treatment allowed discontinuation of insulin treatment in 11/16 (69%) of patients while improving glycemic and metabolic health. We found increased postprandial unconjugated bile acid responses (all P < 0.05), an overall increased secondary bile acid response (P = 0.036) and a higher 12α-hydroxylated:non-12α-hydroxylated ratio (P < 0.001). Total bile acid concentrations were unaffected by the intervention. Postprandial FGF19 and 7-α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) concentrations decreased postintervention (both P < 0.01). Our study demonstrates that DMR with GLP-1 modulates the postprandial bile acid response. The alterations in postprandial bile acid responses may be the result of changes in the microbiome, ileal bile acid uptake and improved insulin sensitivity. Controlled studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism linking the combination treatment to metabolic health and bile acids.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Glycemic and metabolic improvements are seen in patients with type 2 diabetes after replacing their insulin therapy with DMR and GLP-1. These changes are accompanied by changes in postprandial bile acid concentrations: increased unconjugated and secondary bile acids.

Keywords: DMR; bile acids; diabetes type 2; duodenal ablation; duodenal mucosal resurfacing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.J.G.H.M.B. received research support from Fractyl Laboratories Inc. for IRB-based studies and received a consultancy fee for a single advisory board meeting of Fractyl in September 2019. None of the other authors has any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to disclose.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Postprandial excursions of total bile acids (A), CA (B), CDCA (C), DCA (D), and UDCA (E). Effects of the combination treatment were analyzed with a mixed effect model. *P ≤ 0.05 and ***P ≤ 0.001. Concentrations are presented as means (SE). CA, cholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Postprandial excursions of the primary:secondary bile acid ratio (A) and hydroxylated:non-12α-hydroxylated bile acid ratio (B). The primary:secondary bile acid ratio was calculated by the sum of CA and CDCA (plus their conjugates gCA, tCA, gCDCA, and tCDCA) concentrations divided by the sum of DCA, LCA, and UDCA (plus their conjugates gDCA, tDCA, gLCA, tLCA, gUDCA, and tUDCA) concentrations for all time points. The 12α-hydroxylated:non-12α-hydroxylated bile acid ratio was calculated by the sum of CA and DCA (plus their conjugates gCA, tCA, gDCA, and tDCA) concentrations divided by the sum of CDCA, LCA, and UDCA (plus their conjugates gCDCA, tCDCA, gLCA, tLCA, gUDCA, and tUDCA). Effects of the combination treatment were analyzed with a mixed effect model. ***P ≤ 0.001. Concentrations are presented as means (SE). BAs, bile acids; CA, cholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; g-, glycine-conjugated; gCA, glycocholic acid; gCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholic acid; gDCA, glycodeoxycholic acid; gLCA, glycodeoxycholic acid; gUDCA, glycoursodeoxycholic; LCA, lithocholic acid; t-, taurine conjugated; tCA, taurocholic acid; tCDCA, taurochenodeoxycholic acid; tLCA, taurolithocholic acid; tDCA, taurodeoxycholic acid; tUDCA, tauroursodeoxycholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Postprandial excursions of the primary bile acids (A), the secondary bile acids (B), the 12α-hydroxylated bile acids (C) and the non-12α-hydroxylated bile acids (D). Effects of the combination treatment were analyzed with a mixed effect model. *P ≤ 0.05. Concentrations are presented as mean (SE). BA, bile acids.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Postprandial excursions of FGF19 (A) and C4 (B). The unit of fasting and peak concentrations is pg/mL for FGF19 and ng/mL for C4. Effects of the combination treatment were analyzed with a mixed effect model. **P ≤ 0.01 and ***P ≤ 0.001. Concentrations are presented as mean (SE). C4, 7-α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one; FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19.

References

    1. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, Malanda B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 138: 271–281, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 41: 2669–2701, 2018. doi:10.2337/dci18-0033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, Kolotkin RL, LaMonte MJ, Pendleton RC, Strong MB, Vinik R, Wanner NA, Hopkins PN, Gress RE, Walker JM, Cloward TV, Nuttall RT, Hammoud A, Greenwood JL, Crosby RD, McKinlay R, Simper SC, Smith SC, Hunt SC. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA 308: 1122–1131, 2012. doi:10.1001/2012.jama.11164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, Varela JE, Eagon CJ, Colditz GA. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg 149: 275–287, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park JY. Prediction of type 2 diabetes remission after bariatric or metabolic surgery. J Obes Metab Syndr 27: 213–222, 2018. doi:10.7570/jomes.2018.27.4.213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms