Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Aug;130(2):193-199.
doi: 10.1111/bju.15683. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study

Antti Rannikko et al. BJU Int. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a population-based screening trial using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a kallikrein panel and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aimed at minimizing overdiagnosis, while retaining mortality benefit.

Patients and methods: Feasibility of the screening algorithm was evaluated in terms of participation, screening test results and cancer detection. A random sample of 400 men aged 65 years was identified from the population registry and invited for screening with three stepwise tests (PSA, kallikrein panel and MRI). Men with PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL were further tested with the kallikrein panel, and those with positive findings (risk >7.5%) were referred for prostate MRI. Men with positive MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score 3-5) had targeted biopsies only. Men with negative MRI, but PSA density ≥0.15 underwent systematic biopsies.

Results: Of the 399 men invited, 158 (40%) participated and 27 had PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL (7% of the invited and 17% of the participants). Of these, 22 had a positive kallikrein panel (6% of the invited and 81% of the PSA-positive men). Finally, 10 men (3% of the invited and 45% of 4Kscore [kallikrein panel]-positive) had a suspicious MRI finding (PI-RADS score ≥3) and five were diagnosed with a clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group [GG] ≥2) at fusion biopsy (3% of the participants), with two GG 1 cases (1%). Additional testing (kallikrein panel and MRI) after PSA reduced biopsies by 56%.

Conclusion: The findings constitute proof of principle for our screening protocol, as we achieved a substantial detection rate for clinically significant cancer with few clinically insignificant cases. Participation, however, was suboptimal.

Keywords: #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; 4-kallikrein panel; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; randomized trial; screening; targeted biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Thompson IM, Klotz L. Active surveillance for prostate cancer. JAMA 2010; 304: 2411–2 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow‐up. Lancet 2014; 384: 2027–35 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsodikov A, Gulati R, Heijnsdijk EAM et al. Reconciling the effects of screening on prostate cancer mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO trials. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167: 449–55 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Månsson M et al. A 16‐yr follow‐up of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2019; 76: 43–51 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B et al. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 234 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types