Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 15;10(12):1629.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10121629.

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) Kit for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) Kit for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Alexander Domnich et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Although the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is considered a standard-of-care assay for the laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, several limitations of this method have been described. Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is an alternative molecular assay and is potentially able to overcome some intrinsic shortcomings of RT-PCR. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the novel HG COVID-19 RT-LAMP assay. In this retrospective analysis, a total of 400 routinely collected leftover nasopharyngeal samples with a known RT-PCR result were tested by means of the HG COVID-19 RT-LAMP assay. The overall sensitivity and specificity values of HG COVID-19 RT-LAMP versus RT-PCR were 97.0% (95% CI: 93.6-98.9%) and 98.5% (95% CI: 95.7-99.7%), respectively. Inter-assay agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.96). Concordance was perfect in samples with high viral loads (cycle threshold < 30). The average time to a positive result on RT-LAMP was 17 min. HG COVID-19 RT-LAMP is a reliable molecular diagnostic kit for detecting SARS-CoV-2, and its performance is comparable to that of RT-PCR. Shorter turnaround times and the possibility of performing molecular diagnostics in the point-of-care setting make it a valuable option for facilities without sophisticated laboratory equipment.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-LAMP; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between N gene cycle threshold values and time to positive result on the HG COVID-19 RT-LAMP assay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Venter M., Richter K. Towards effective diagnostic assays for COVID-19: A review. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020;73:370–377. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206685. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ravi N., Cortade D.L., Ng E., Wang S.X. Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A comprehensive review of the FDA-EUA COVID-19 testing landscape. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020;165:112454. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112454. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russo A., Minichini C., Starace M., Astorri R., Calò F., Coppola N., Vanvitelli COVID-19 Group Current status of laboratory diagnosis for COVID-19: A narrative review. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020;13:2657–2665. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S264020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Böger B., Fachi M.M., Vilhena R.O., Cobre A.F., Tonin F.S., Pontarolo R. Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2021;49:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caruana G., Croxatto A., Coste A.T., Opota O., Lamoth F., Jaton K., Greub G. Diagnostic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection and interpretation of microbiological results. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020;26:1178–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources