Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4508.
doi: 10.3390/nu13124508.

A Low-Glucose Eating Pattern Improves Biomarkers of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: An Exploratory Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Feasibility Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Low-Glucose Eating Pattern Improves Biomarkers of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: An Exploratory Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Feasibility Trial

Susan M Schembre et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Postmenopausal breast cancer is the most common obesity-related cancer death among women in the U.S. Insulin resistance, which worsens in the setting of obesity, is associated with higher breast cancer incidence and mortality. Maladaptive eating patterns driving insulin resistance represent a key modifiable risk factor for breast cancer. Emerging evidence suggests that time-restricted feeding paradigms (TRF) improve cancer-related metabolic risk factors; however, more flexible approaches could be more feasible and effective. In this exploratory, secondary analysis, we identified participants following a low-glucose eating pattern (LGEP), defined as consuming energy when glucose levels are at or below average fasting levels, as an alternative to TRF. Results show that following an LGEP regimen for at least 40% of reported eating events improves insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and other cancer-related serum biomarkers. The magnitude of serum biomarkers changes observed here has previously been shown to favorably modulate benign breast tissue in women with overweight and obesity who are at risk for postmenopausal breast cancer. By comparison, the observed effects of LGEP were similar to results from previously published TRF studies in similar populations. These preliminary findings support further testing of LGEP as an alternative to TRF and a postmenopausal breast cancer prevention strategy. However, results should be interpreted with caution, given the exploratory nature of analyses.

Keywords: adherence; blood glucose; eating physiology; food intake regulation; metabolism; obesity; weight management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Glucose eating patterns over 16 weeks. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of a low- vs. high-glucose eating pattern on weight, energy intake, and metabolic outcomes at 16 weeks. Bars represented the mean value. IGF-1 = Insulin-like growth factor 1, MAGE = mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, CRP = c-reactive protein, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in glucose levels between baseline and 16 weeks for one participant. Summary of 5 days of CGM data at baseline (orange) and 8 days of CGM data at week 8 (blue) after 16 weeks of following a low-glucose eating pattern for a woman with a normal range glycated hemoglobin level (HbA1c = 5.1%) at baseline. Solid lines represent the mean glucose; the shaded areas are standard deviations. This participant followed the low-glucose eating pattern for 18% of eating events at baseline, 91% at week 8, and 76% at week 16. Her baseline fasting glucose of 104 mg/dL and was 84 mg/dL at week 16, a 19% reduction. Her low-glucose eating was present for more eating events than other participants and thus is not representative of all participants, but shows the large change in 2-h glucose levels observed in an individual without prediabetes. low-glucose eating pattern (LGEP).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Cancer Research Fund. American Institute for Cancer Research . Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. The American Institute for Cancer Research; Washington, DC, USA: 2007.
    1. American Cancer Society . Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019–2020. American Cancer Society; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2019.
    1. Harvie M., Howell A., Vierkant R.A., Kumar N., Cerhan J.R., Kelemen L.E., Folsom A.R., Sellers T.A. Association of gain and loss of weight before and after menopause with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the Iowa women’s health study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005;14:656–661. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lahmann P.H., Schulz M., Hoffmann K., Boeing H., Tjonneland A., Olsen A., Overvad K., Key T.J., Allen N.E., Khaw K.T., et al. Long-term weight change and breast cancer risk: The European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) Br. J. Cancer. 2005;93:582–589. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602763. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eliassen A.H., Colditz G.A., Rosner B., Willett W.C., Hankinson S.E. Adult weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA. 2006;296:193–201. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.2.193. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types