Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 3;9(12):1434.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121434.

Vaccine Procurement: A Conceptual Framework Based on Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Vaccine Procurement: A Conceptual Framework Based on Literature Review

Vincenza Gianfredi et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Ensuring timely access to affordable vaccines has been acknowledged as a global public health priority, as also recently testified by the debate sparked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Effective vaccine procurement strategies are essential to reach this goal. Nevertheless, this is still a neglected research topic. A narrative literature review on vaccine procurement was conducted, by retrieving articles from four academic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, WebOfScience), 'grey' literature reports, and institutional websites. The aim was to clarify key concepts and definitions relating to vaccine procurement, describe main vaccine procurement methods, and identify knowledge gaps and future perspectives. A theoretical conceptual framework was developed of the key factors involved in vaccine procurement, which include quality and safety of the product, forecasting and budgeting, procurement legislation, financial sustainability, and plurality of manufacture, contracting, investment in training, storage and service delivery, monitoring and evaluation. This information can be useful to support policymakers during planning, implementation, and evaluation of regional and national vaccine procurement strategies and policies.

Keywords: Europe; immunization; review; vaccine; vaccine procurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the selection process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008;86:81–160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robson M., Andrus J.K., Toscano C.M., Lewis M., Oliveira L., Ropero A.M., Davila M., Fitzsimmons J.W. A model for enhancing evidence-based capacity to make informed policy decisions on the introduction of new vaccines in the Americas: PAHO’s ProVac initiative. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:811–816. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200613. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huff-Rousselle M. The logical underpinnings and benefits of pooled pharmaceutical procurement: A pragmatic role for our public institutions? Soc. Sci. Med. 2012;75:1572–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baethge C., Goldbeck-Wood S., Mertens S. SANRA—A scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pubmed/National Library of Medicine’s Publication Characteristics (Publication Types) with Scope Notes. [(accessed on 3 March 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/pubtypes.html.