Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;37(1):397-410.
doi: 10.1080/14756366.2021.2015343.

New benzoxazole derivatives as potential VEGFR-2 inhibitors and apoptosis inducers: design, synthesis, anti-proliferative evaluation, flowcytometric analysis, and in silico studies

Affiliations

New benzoxazole derivatives as potential VEGFR-2 inhibitors and apoptosis inducers: design, synthesis, anti-proliferative evaluation, flowcytometric analysis, and in silico studies

Hazem Elkady et al. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2022 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2022 Dec;37(1):514. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2022.2024999. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2022. PMID: 34986713 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

A new series of benzoxazole derivatives were designed and synthesised to have the main essential pharmacophoric features of VEGFR-2 inhibitors. Cytotoxic activities were evaluated for all derivatives against two human cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and HepG2. Also, the effect of the most cytotoxic derivatives on VEGFR-2 protein concentration was assessed by ELISA. Compounds 14o, 14l, and 14b showed the highest activities with VEGFR-2 protein concentrations of 586.3, 636.2, and 705.7 pg/ml, respectively. Additionally, the anti-angiogenic property of compound 14b against human umbilical vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC) was performed using a wound healing migration assay. Compound 14b reduced proliferation and migratory potential of HUVEC cells. Furthermore, compound 14b was subjected to further biological investigations including cell cycle and apoptosis analyses. Compound 14b arrested the HepG2 cell growth at the Pre-G1 phase and induced apoptosis by 16.52%, compared to 0.67% in the control (HepG2) cells. The effect of apoptosis was buttressed by a 4.8-fold increase in caspase-3 level compared to the control cells. Besides, different in silico docking studies were also performed to get better insights into the possible binding mode of the target compounds with VEGFR-2 active sites.

Keywords: Anti-proliferative; VEGFR-2 inhibitors; apoptosis; benzoxazole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Some reported VEGFR-2 inhibitors with the essential pharmacophoric features of VEGFR-2 inhibitor agents.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of the proposed VEGFR-2 inhibitors modifications.
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
General synthetic route of target salts 9a–c.
Scheme 2.
Scheme 2.
General synthetic route of target intermediates 13a–e.
Scheme 3.
Scheme 3.
General synthetic route of target final compounds 14a–o.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
In vitro cytotoxic activities of different chemical compounds. *Significant from Sorafenib group at p < 0.001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The effect of the most cytotoxic compounds 14b, 14n, 14l, 14i, 14o, and 14a were investigated on VEGFR-2 in HepG2 cells compared to sorafenib as a reference drug. HepG2 cells were treated with sorafenib (3.38 µM), 14b (4.61 µM), 14n (9.93 µM), 14l (6.70 µM), 14i (3.22 µM), 14o (7.01 µM), and 14a (3.95 µM). Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three different experiments. *Significant from the control group at p-value <0.001.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effects of compound 14b on endothelial cell migration in HUVEC cells compared to sorafenib. (A) Control/HUVECs, (B) HUVECs were treated with compound 14b for 72 h. (C) HUVECs were treated with sorafenib for 72 h. (D) Represents the graphical illustration for % of wound closure in control, sorafenib and 14b treated cells. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three different experiments. *Significant from the control group at p < 0.001.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Flow cytometry analysis for cell cycle distribution of HepG2 cells. (A) Control (HepG2 cells), (B) The representative histogram shows the cell cycle distribution of cells treated with 14b, and (C) Represents the graphical illustration for cell cycle distribution analysis among different treated cells. *Significant from the control group at p < 0.001.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Compound 14b induced apoptosis in HepG2 cells. (A) Control (HepG2 cells), (B) 14b, and (C) Represent the graphical illustration for % of apoptotic and necrotic cells among cells among control (HepG2) cells and compound 14b treated cells. *Significant from the control group at p < 0.001.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Effects of compound 14b on Caspase 3 level in HepG2 cells. Values are reported as mean ± SEM of three different experiments. *p < 0.001 indicates statistically significant differences from the control (HepG2) group.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Superimposition of the co-crystallized molecule (mint green) and the docking pose (red) of the same molecule inside the VEGFR-2 kinase active site.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
3D representation of sorafenib with VEGFR-2 active site.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
The predicted binding pattern of 14b with the active site of VEGFR-2.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
The predicted binding pattern of 14n with the active site of VEGFR-2.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
The predicted binding pattern of 14l with the active site of VEGFR-2.

References

    1. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med 1995;1:27–30. - PubMed
    1. Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis: past, present and the near future. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:505–15. - PubMed
    1. Behdani M, Zeinali S, Khanahmad H, et al. . Generation and characterization of a functional nanobody against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2; angiogenesis cell receptor. Mol Immunol 2012;50:35–41. - PubMed
    1. Lee YT, Tan YJ, Oon CE.. Molecular targeted therapy: treating cancer with specificity. Eur J Pharmacol 2018;834:188–96. - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Kovar J, Sissons S, et al. . A cell-based immunocytochemical assay for monitoring kinase signaling pathways and drug efficacy. Anal Biochem 2005;338:136–42. - PubMed

MeSH terms