Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Dec 27;25(1):448.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03864-3.

Predictors for extubation failure in COVID-19 patients using a machine learning approach

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Predictors for extubation failure in COVID-19 patients using a machine learning approach

Lucas M Fleuren et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: Determining the optimal timing for extubation can be challenging in the intensive care. In this study, we aim to identify predictors for extubation failure in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Methods: We used highly granular data from 3464 adult critically ill COVID patients in the multicenter Dutch Data Warehouse, including demographics, clinical observations, medications, fluid balance, laboratory values, vital signs, and data from life support devices. All intubated patients with at least one extubation attempt were eligible for analysis. Transferred patients, patients admitted for less than 24 h, and patients still admitted at the time of data extraction were excluded. Potential predictors were selected by a team of intensive care physicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were extubation without reintubation or death within the next 7 days and within 48 h, respectively. We trained and validated multiple machine learning algorithms using fivefold nested cross-validation. Predictor importance was estimated using Shapley additive explanations, while cutoff values for the relative probability of failed extubation were estimated through partial dependence plots.

Results: A total of 883 patients were included in the model derivation. The reintubation rate was 13.4% within 48 h and 18.9% at day 7, with a mortality rate of 0.6% and 1.0% respectively. The grandient-boost model performed best (area under the curve of 0.70) and was used to calculate predictor importance. Ventilatory characteristics and settings were the most important predictors. More specifically, a controlled mode duration longer than 4 days, a last fraction of inspired oxygen higher than 35%, a mean tidal volume per kg ideal body weight above 8 ml/kg in the day before extubation, and a shorter duration in assisted mode (< 2 days) compared to their median values. Additionally, a higher C-reactive protein and leukocyte count, a lower thrombocyte count, a lower Glasgow coma scale and a lower body mass index compared to their medians were associated with extubation failure.

Conclusion: The most important predictors for extubation failure in critically ill COVID-19 patients include ventilatory settings, inflammatory parameters, neurological status, and body mass index. These predictors should therefore be routinely captured in electronic health records.

Keywords: Extubation; Extubation failure; Prediction; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SHAP values for most important predictors of extubation failure. Overview of SHAP values for the top 20 predictors of successful extubation (negative SHAP values) or unsuccessful extubation (positive SHAP values). Features are ordered according to importance. FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen, IBW: ideal body weight, PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure, P/F ratio: PaO2/FiO2 ratio
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Partial dependence plots. PD-plot for the last FiO2 recording, mean glasgow coma score and tidal volume per kg ideal body weight in the last 24 h, and duration of the controlled mode

Comment in

References

    1. Thille AW, Richard J-CM, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:1294–1302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1523CI. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2126–2136. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ventilator-Associated Events: Prevalence, Outcome, and Relat ionship With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Critical Care Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 17]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Abstract/2015/09000/Ventilator_Assoc...
    1. Baptistella AR, Sarmento FJ, da Silva KR, Baptistella SF, Taglietti M, Zuquello RÁ, et al. Predictive factors of weaning from mechanical ventilation and extubation outcome: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2018;48:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heunks LM, van der Hoeven JG. Clinical review: The ABC of weaning failure—a structured approach. Crit Care. 2010;14:245. doi: 10.1186/cc9296. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types