Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 28;16(1):357.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01740-3.

Survival prognostic and recurrence risk factors after single pulmonary metastasectomy

Affiliations

Survival prognostic and recurrence risk factors after single pulmonary metastasectomy

Céline Forster et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Identification of the prognostic factors of recurrence and survival after single pulmonary metastasectomy (PM).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent PM for a single lung metastasis between 2003 and 2018.

Results: A total of 162 patients with a median age of 64 years underwent single PM. Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) was performed in 83.9% of cases. Surgical resection was achieved by wedge in 73.5%, segmentectomy in 7.4%, lobectomy in 17.9% and pneumonectomy in 1.2% of cases. The median durations of hospital stay and of drainage were 4 days (IQR 3-7) and 1 day (IQR 1-2), respectively. During the follow-up (median 31 months; IQR 15-58), 93 patients (57.4%) presented recurrences and repeated PM could be realized in 35 patients (21.6%) achieved by VATS in 77.1%. Non-colorectal tumour (HR 1.84), age < 70 years (HR 1.77) and previous extra-thoracic metastases (HR 1.61) were identified as prognostic factors of recurrence. Overall survival at 5-year was estimated at 67%. Non-colorectal tumour (HR 2.40) and mediastinal lymph nodes involvement (HR 3.42) were significantly associated with an increased risk of death.

Conclusions: Despite high recurrence rates after PM, surgical resection shows low morbidity rate and acceptable long-term survival, thus should remain the standard treatment for single pulmonary metastases.

Trial registration: The Local Ethics Committee approved the study (No. 2019-02,474) and individual consent was waived.

Keywords: Pulmonary metastasectomy; Pulmonary metastases; VATS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival (OS) after first single pulmonary metastasectomy (PM)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gonzalez M, Zellweger M, Nardini M, et al. Precision surgery in lung metastasectomy. Future Oncol. 2019 doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0713. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomford NR, Woolner LB, Clagett OT. The surgical treatment of metastatic tumors in the lungs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1965;49:357–363. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)33271-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellier J, Perentes JY, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, et al. A plea for thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodule in cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4705–4710. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5543-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirai F, Kinoshita I, Matsubara T, et al. Which primary organ is most suitable for performing pulmonary metastasectomy? Anticancer Res. 2018;38:1041–1045. - PubMed
    1. Pastorino U, Buyse M, Friedel G, et al. Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:37–49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70397-0. - DOI - PubMed