Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Oct;19(6):1463-1470.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13743. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

Prophylactic sacral protective dressings' effect on preventing pressure injury: A meta-analysis

Xinyan Gong  1 , Ruimin Xu  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prophylactic sacral protective dressings' effect on preventing pressure injury: A meta-analysis

Xinyan Gong et al. Int Wound J. 2022 Oct.

Retraction in

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic sacral protective dressings on preventing pressure injury. A systematic literature search up to July 2021 was performed, and 11 studies included 5150 community or hospital-based adult subjects requiring care at the start of the study; 2832 of them were using sacral protective dressings and 2318 were given standard care with no sacral protective dressings. They were reporting relationships between the effects of prophylactic sacral protective dressings on preventing pressure injury. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effects of prophylactic sacral protective dressings on preventing pressure injury using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Sacral protective dressings had a significantly lower incidence of pressure injuries (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.53, P < .001) compared with standard care with no sacral protective dressings in community- or hospital-based adult subjects requiring care. Sacral protective dressings had a significantly lower incidence of pressure injuries compared with standard care with no sacral protective dressings in community- or hospital-based adult subjects requiring care. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: pressure injury; prevention; protective dressing; sacral.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic diagram of the study procedure
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot of the effect of prophylactic sacral protective dressings on preventing pressure injury
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O'Rourke M. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care agenda for improvement and implementation. Asia Pac J Health Manag. 2007;2(2):21‐25.
    1. Jackson D, Durrant L, Bishop E, et al. Pain associated with pressure injury: a qualitative study of community‐based, home‐dwelling individuals. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(12):3061‐3069. - PubMed
    1. Lim M, Ang S. Impact of hospital‐acquired pressure injuries on hospital costs‐experience of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Wound Pract Res. 2017;25(1):42‐47.
    1. Padula WV, Pronovost PJ. Addressing the multisectoral impact of pressure injuries in the USA, UK and Abroad. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(3):171‐173. - PubMed
    1. Lyder CH, Wang Y, Metersky M, et al. Hospital‐acquired pressure ulcers: results from the national Medicare patient safety monitoring system study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(9):1603‐1608. - PubMed