Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;25(2):579-606.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13391. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

Assessing the efficacy of coproduction to better understand the barriers to achieving sustainability in NHS chronic kidney services and create alternate pathways

Leah Mc Laughlin  1 , Gail Williams  2 , Gareth Roberts  3 , David Dallimore  1 , David Fellowes  4 , Joanne Popham  5 , Joanna Charles  6 , James Chess  7 , Sarah Hirst Williams  8 , Jonathan Mathews  2 , Teri Howells  4 , Judith Stone  9 , Linzi Isaac  10 , Jane Noyes  1
Affiliations

Assessing the efficacy of coproduction to better understand the barriers to achieving sustainability in NHS chronic kidney services and create alternate pathways

Leah Mc Laughlin et al. Health Expect. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Too many people living with chronic kidney disease are opting for and starting on hospital-based dialysis compared to a home-based kidney replacement therapy. Dialysis services are becoming financially unsustainable.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of coproductive research in chronic kidney disease service improvement to achieve greater sustainability.

Design: A 2-year coproductive service improvement study was conducted with multiple stakeholders with the specific intention of maximizing engagement with the national health kidney services, patients and public.

Setting and participants: A national health kidney service (3 health boards, 18 dialysis units), patients and families (n = 50), multidisciplinary teams including doctors, nurses, psychologists, social workers, and so forth (n = 68), kidney charities, independent dialysis service providers and wider social services were part of this study.

Findings: Coproductive research identified underutilized resources (e.g., patients on home dialysis and social services) and their potential, highlighted unmet social care needs for patients and families and informed service redesign. Education packages were reimagined to support the home dialysis agenda including opportunities for wider service input. The impacts of one size fits all approaches to dialysis on specialist workforce skills were made clearer and also professional, patient and public perceptions of key sustainability policies.

Discussion and conclusions: Patient and key stakeholders mapped out new ways to link services to create more sustainable models of kidney health and social care. Maintaining principles of knowledge coproduction could help achieve financial sustainability and move towards more prudent adult chronic kidney disease services.

Patient or public contribution: Involved in developing research questions, study design, management and conduct, interpretation of evidence and dissemination.

Keywords: coproduction; dialysis; family; kidney disease; patient; service improvement study; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall study diagram, highlighting the coproductive elements and the focus of this paper
Figure 2
Figure 2
Map of kidney services across Wales
Figure 3
Figure 3
Draft service improvement documents ‘Pathways to Home’
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Global Facts: About Kidney Disease. National Kidney Foundation. Accessed July 6, 2020. https://www.kidney.org/kidneydisease/global-facts-about-kidney-disease#_...
    1. Coresh J. Update on the burden of CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(4):1020‐1022. 10.1681/ASN.2016121374 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jha V, Modi GK. Getting to know the enemy better—the global burden of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2018;94(3):462‐464. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraser SDS, Roderick PJ. Kidney disease in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(4):193‐194. 10.1038/s41581-019-0120-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709‐733. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types