The Prognostic Value of Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 34967589
- PMCID: PMC9080387
- DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.4057
The Prognostic Value of Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Prognostic biomarkers in cervical cancer are widely investigated, including cancer stem cell (CSC) markers. However, their significance remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the role of cervical cancer stem cell (CCSC) markers for survival.
Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021237072) of studies reporting CCSC markers as the prognostic predictor based on PRISMA guidelines. We included English articles investigating associations of CCSCs expression in tissue tumor with overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) from PubMed, EBSCO, and The Cochrane Library databases. The quality of studies was analyzed based on Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.
Results: From 413 publications, after study selection with inclusion and exclusion criteria, 22 studies were included. High expressions of CCSC markers were associated with poor OS and DFS (HR= 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.07, P <0.0001; HR= 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09 - 1.17, P <0.00001; respectively). Sub-analysis of individual CCSC markers indicated significant correlations between CD44 (HR= 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07 - 1.22, P 0.0001), SOX2 (HR= 1.58, 95% CI: 1.17 - 2.14, P 0.003), OCT4 (HR= 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.06, P 0.008), ALDH1 (HR= 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13 - 1.64, P 0.001), and CD49f (HR= 3.02, 95% CI: 1.37 - 6.64, P 0.006) with worse OS; OCT4 (HR= 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 - 1.22, P 0.0003), SOX2 (HR= 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.16, P <0.0001), and ALDH1 (HR= 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10 - 1.35, P 0.0002) with poor DFS. We did not conduct a meta-analysis for MSI-1 and CK17 because only one study investigated those markers.
Conclusion: Expressions of OCT4, SOX2, and ALDH1 were associated with poor OS and DFS in cervical cancer tissue. These markers might have potential roles as prognostic biomarkers to predict unfavorable survival.
Keywords: ALDH1; Cervical cancer stem cell marker; Oct4; SOX2; prognostic biomarker.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Hyaluronan-CD44v3 interaction with Oct4-Sox2-Nanog promotes miR-302 expression leading to self-renewal, clonal formation, and cisplatin resistance in cancer stem cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.J Biol Chem. 2012 Sep 21;287(39):32800-24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.308528. Epub 2012 Jul 30. J Biol Chem. 2012. PMID: 22847005 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Ovarian Cancer Patients: Evidence from 52 Studies.Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(4):1716-1726. doi: 10.1159/000489586. Epub 2018 Apr 28. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018. PMID: 29730663
-
Putative stem cell markers in cervical squamous cell carcinoma are correlated with poor clinical outcome.BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 24;15:785. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1826-4. BMC Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26499463 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic value of octamer binding transcription factor 4 for patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22804. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022804. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33080755 Free PMC article.
-
The Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value of ALDH1 Expression in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2024;19(5):599-609. doi: 10.2174/0115748928265992230925053308. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2024. PMID: 37818578
Cited by
-
Association of CD133, ALDH1, CD117 and OCT4 expression with prognosis of patients with cervical cancer.Virchows Arch. 2025 Apr;486(4):791-801. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03862-0. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Virchows Arch. 2025. PMID: 38981932
-
Targeting Cervical Cancer Stem Cells by Phytochemicals.Curr Med Chem. 2024;31(32):5222-5254. doi: 10.2174/0109298673281823231222065616. Curr Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 38288813 Review.
-
Resveratrol: Sensitising CD44+ Cervical Cancer Cells to Carboplatin and Mitigating Metastasis.Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71194. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71194. Cancer Med. 2025. PMID: 40888184 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The SW480 cell line, overexpressing PIWIL2 gene, maintains the expression of stemness and proliferation genes in the mice xenografts.Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(1):492-498. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i1.2661. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023. PMID: 37070109 Free PMC article.
-
Unveiling diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer: biomarker discovery through proteomics approaches and exploring the role of cervical cancer stem cells.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 24;13:1277772. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277772. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38328436 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Key Statistics for Cervical Cancer. 2021. [[Accessed on 26 January 2021]]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/key-statistics.html.
-
- Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444:756–60. - PubMed
-
- Boumahdi S, Driessens G, Lapouge G, et al. SOX2 controls tumour initiation and cancer stem-cell functions in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nature. 2014;511:246–50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous