Femoral Lengthening in Children-A Comparison Between Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and External Fixators
- PMID: 34967804
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002039
Femoral Lengthening in Children-A Comparison Between Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and External Fixators
Abstract
Background: Femoral lengthening can be achieved using external fixators or intramedullary lengthening nails. The purpose of this research was to compare the outcome of femoral lengthening in children using PRECICE magnetic lengthening nails with lengthening external fixators.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 50 children who had femoral lengthening. Group A included patients who had lengthening with external fixation, patients in Group B had lengthening with PRECICE intramedullary lengthening nails. Each group included 25 patients. The sample strictly included children aged between 11 and 17 years. Patients in each group were matched according to age and indication for lengthening whether congenital or acquired conditions. The outcomes focused on the ability to achieve target length, healing index, residual malalignment, length of hospitalization following the osteotomy surgery, and encountered complications.
Results: Mean patient age was 14.7 years for each group. The length gain was 42±12 mm for Group A and 41.6±8 mm for Group B (P=0.84). Lengthening nails achieved the target length more accurately compared with external fixation (P=0.017). The healing index was significantly higher in group A with 53.2±19 days/cm compared with 40.2±14 days/cm in group B (P=0.03). Group A had significantly higher complications than group B (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the final coronal malalignment between the 2 groups (P=0.2). The mean length of stay was 9.2±5.8 days for group A and 4.2±3.3 days for group B (P=0.0005).
Conclusion: Magnetic lengthening nails are clinically effective for femoral lengthening in the pediatric population. Compared with external fixation, healing index and complications were more favorable with PRECICE nails. Further research is required to study the cost-effectiveness of this technique.
Level of evidence: Level IV-case series.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Prince DE, Herzenberg JE, Standard SC, et al. Lengthening with external fixation is effective in congenital femoral deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3261–3271.
-
- Birch JG. A brief history of limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37(suppl 2):S1–S8.
-
- Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81–104.
-
- Ghoneem HF, Wright JG, Cole WG, et al. The Ilizarov method for correction of complex deformities. Psychological and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1480–1485.
-
- Landge V, Shabtai L, Gesheff M, et al. Patient satisfaction after limb lengthening with internal and external devices. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2015;24:174–179.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
