Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Oct 14;23(4):1083-1098.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab045.

Individual participant data meta-analysis with mixed-effects transformation models

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Individual participant data meta-analysis with mixed-effects transformation models

Bálint Tamási et al. Biostatistics. .

Abstract

One-stage meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) poses several statistical and computational challenges. For time-to-event outcomes, the approach requires the estimation of complicated nonlinear mixed-effects models that are flexible enough to realistically capture the most important characteristics of the IPD. We present a model class that incorporates general normally distributed random effects into linear transformation models. We discuss extensions to model between-study heterogeneity in baseline risks and covariate effects and also relax the assumption of proportional hazards. Within the proposed framework, data with arbitrary random censoring patterns can be handled. The accompanying $\textsf{R}$ package tramME utilizes the Laplace approximation and automatic differentiation to perform efficient maximum likelihood estimation and inference in mixed-effects transformation models. We compare several variants of our model to predict the survival of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a large data set of prognostic studies. Finally, a simulation study is presented that verifies the correctness of the implementation and highlights its efficiency compared to an alternative approach.

Keywords: Individual participant data; Meta-analysis; Mixed-effects model; Prognostic modeling; Regression; Time-to-event outcomes; Transformation model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Conditional mean effects of the prognostic factors and their 95% pointwise confidence intervals.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Model 4: 95% pointwise confidence intervals and predictive intervals of the prognostic factor effects on the log-cumulative hazard scale.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of the distribution of the time-varying fixed-effects estimates from the simulation study (500 iterations). (A) The log-cumulative baseline hazard is presented, while (B–D) depict the time-dependent conditional mean effects of the three covariates.

References

    1. Aalen, O. O., Borgan, Ø. and Gjessing, H. K. (2008). Survival and Event History Analysis. New York: Springer.
    1. Bellou, V., Belbasis, L., Konstantinidis, A. K., Tzoulaki, I. and Evangelou, E. (2019). Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ 367, l5358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 26, 211–252.
    1. Burke, D. L., Ensor, J. and Riley, R. D. (2017). Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ. Statistics in Medicine 36, 855–875. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng, S.-C., Wei, L. J. and Ying, Z. (1995). Analysis of transformation models with censored data. Biometrika 82, 835–845.

Publication types