Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan 6;51(1):afab220.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab220.

Is comprehensive geriatric assessment hospital at home a cost-effective alternative to hospital admission for older people?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Is comprehensive geriatric assessment hospital at home a cost-effective alternative to hospital admission for older people?

Surya Singh et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: hospital level healthcare in the home guided by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) might provide a less costly alternative to hospitalisation for older people.

Objective: to determine the cost-effectiveness of CGA admission avoidance hospital at home (HAH) compared with hospital admission.

Design/intervention: a cost-effectiveness study alongside a randomised trial of CGA in an admission avoidance HAH setting, compared with admission to hospital.

Participants/setting: older people considered for a hospital admission in nine locations across the UK were randomised using a 2:1 randomisation schedule to admission avoidance HAH with CGA (N = 700), or admission to hospital with CGA when available (N = 355).

Measurements: quality adjusted life years, resource use and costs at baseline and 6 months; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. The main analysis used complete cases.

Results: adjusting for baseline covariates, HAH was less costly than admission to hospital from a health and social care perspective (mean -£2,265, 95% CI: -4,279 to -252), and remained less costly with the addition of informal care costs (mean difference -£2,840, 95% CI: -5,495 to -185). There was no difference in quality adjusted survival. Using multiple imputation for missing data, the mean difference in health and social care costs widened to -£2,458 (95% CI: -4,977 to 61) and societal costs remained significantly lower (-£3,083, 95% CI: -5,880 to -287). There was little change to quality adjusted survival.

Conclusions: CGA HAH is a cost-effective alternative to admission to hospital for selected older people.

Keywords: admission avoidance hospital at home; comprehensive geriatric assessment; cost-effectiveness; older people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram of trial participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cost-effectiveness plane showing incremental costs (health and social care perspective) and QALYs, complete cases, using baseline covariate adjustment.

References

    1. Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet 2015; 385: 549–62. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health & Social Care NHS England . Reducing Emergency Admissions. London: National Audit Office. 2018. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Reducing-emergency-adm... (6 April 2021, date last accessed.
    1. OECD . Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems: Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives. OECD Publising; Paris; 2015. 10.1787/9789264233386-en (6 April 2021, date last accessed). - DOI
    1. Finklestein A, Zhou A, Taubman S, J D. Health care hotspotting — a randomized, controlled trial. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 152–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellis G, Gardner M, Tsiachristas A et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017: CD006211. 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3 (12 November 2021, date last accessed). - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types