Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 29;94(4):687-692.
eCollection 2021 Dec.

Patients as Partners in Rare Disease Diagnosis and Research

Affiliations
Review

Patients as Partners in Rare Disease Diagnosis and Research

Alexa T McCray et al. Yale J Biol Med. .

Abstract

There is great value in understanding the patient perspective in rare disease diagnosis and research, and in partnering actively with patients and their families throughout the process. Meaningful and respectful interaction between patients and researchers leads to learning on both sides, and ultimately, to better research outcomes. Researchers can help patients understand how research is conducted and what the latest advances and perceived gaps in research are, and patients, who have direct experience living with their health conditions, can impart to researchers what is most important to them. We describe our engagement with patients in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) program, as well as the lessons we have learned to date. In the UDN, patients have been instrumental in bringing meaning to the work of clinicians and researchers, building patient communities, making the network aware of unmet patient needs, advocating for additional research funding, and disseminating UDN research findings. Although patient engagement in the UDN has already had a significant positive impact on our work, we continue to strive to involve patients earlier in the process, in the research design itself, and in addressing power dynamics that may arise between clinicians, researchers, and patients.

Keywords: Clinical Research; Patient Engagement; Rare Diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Scientific opportunities and public needs: Improving priority setting and public input at the National Institutes of Health. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 1998. - PubMed
    1. Council of Public Representatives. [Internet]. Cited 2021. October 4. https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communicat...
    1. Burgin E. Dollars, disease, and democracy: Has the Director’s Council of Public Representatives improved the National Institutes of Health? Politics Life Sci. 2005. Mar-Sep;24(1-2):43–63. 10.1017/S0730938400007589 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashcroft J, Wykes T, Taylor J, Crowther A, Szmukler G. Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research? J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):28–35. 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101424 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hewlett S, Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum. 2006. Aug;55(4):676–80. 10.1002/art.22091 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types