Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 5:4:PO.19.00317.
doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00317. eCollection 2020.

Evaluating Web-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests for Cancer Susceptibility

Affiliations
Review

Evaluating Web-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests for Cancer Susceptibility

Madison K Kilbride et al. JCO Precis Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Recent years have seen direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing for cancer susceptibility change dramatically. For one, a new model now dominates the market where tests are advertised to consumers but ordered by physicians. For another, many of today's tests are distinguished from earlier DTC offerings for cancer susceptibility by their scope and potential clinical significance. This review provides a comprehensive overview of available DTC genetic tests for cancer susceptibility and identifies aspects of the DTC testing process that could affect consumers' ability to make informed decisions about testing and understand their results.

Methods: First, we provide an overview of each DTC genetic test for cancer susceptibility that includes information about cost; who orders it; whether variants of uncertain significance are returned; availability of genetic counseling; intended users; management of variant reclassifications; whether it is characterized as diagnostic, actionable, and clinically valid; molecular technique used; and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments/College of American Pathologists status. Second, we identify six aspects of the testing process that could affect consumers' ability to make informed decisions about testing and interpret their results: How companies use certain terms (eg, medical grade or clinical grade); how companies use consumers' health information during the ordering process; the extent of genetic counseling provided by companies; companies' procedures for returning results; the role of company-provided ordering physicians; and companies' procedures for communicating variant reclassifications.

Results: On the basis of our review of companies' Web sites, we believe that consumers would benefit from more information about these aspects of testing.

Conclusion: Providing this information would help consumers make informed decisions about whether to use a particular DTC genetic testing service and, should they choose to pursue testing, understand the implications and limitations of their results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Angela R. BradburyConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

References

    1. Vinome : Home.https://vinome.com/
    1. Allyse MA, Robinson DH, Ferber MJ, et al. : Direct-to-consumer testing 2.0: Emerging models of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Mayo Clin Proc 93:113–1202018 - PubMed
    1. Roberts JS, Ostergren J: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and personal genomics services: A review of recent empirical studies.Curr Genet Med Rep 1:182–2002013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard HC, Borry P: Is there a doctor in the house?: The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context.J Community Genet 3:105–1122012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips KA, Trosman JR, Douglas MP: Emergence of hybrid models of genetic testing beyond direct-to-consumer or traditional labs.JAMA 321:2403–24042019 - PMC - PubMed