Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 May;11(5):402-8.

[Analysis of factors related to early mortality in digestive hemorrhage caused by portal hypertension]

[Article in French]
  • PMID: 3497065

[Analysis of factors related to early mortality in digestive hemorrhage caused by portal hypertension]

[Article in French]
J C Melchior et al. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1987 May.

Abstract

In order to determine immediate criteria of prognosis for patients with portal hypertension hospitalized for digestive hemorrhage, in an intensive care unit, 18 variables were recorded during the 24 hours following admission in 65 patients. Data related to death were age, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, shock, active hemorrhage, acute pneumonia, decrease in prothrombin time, use of esophageal balloon tamponade, use of mechanical ventilation, number of red blood cell units transfused. Discriminant analysis yielded a linear combination of 4 variables which best separated survivors from non survivors with the following equation: F = 0.330 X hepatic encephalopathy + 0.433 X shock + 0.226 X active hemorrhage + 0.0097 X age - 0.396. The threshold decision of the hemorrhage prognosis index (HPI) was F = 0.57; 80 p 100 of all patients were correctly classified. In order to be validated, HPI was compared with a general (SAPS) and specific (Pugh's classification) scoring system, in a prospective study of 57 episodes of digestive hemorrhage. In this study, sensitivity was better with HPI than with SAPS (0.70 versus 0.45), specificity was higher with HPI than with Pugh's classification (0.86 versus 0.70). Percentage of correctly classified patients was higher using HPI (81 p. 100) than SAPS (77 p. 100) and Pugh's classification (68 p. 100). We suggest that the HPI, determined with 4 easily defined and recorded variables should be used prospectively to compare efficacy of different treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources