Cardiovascular Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference
- PMID: 34970677
- PMCID: PMC9745438
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-052888F
Cardiovascular Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference
Abstract
Context: Cardiovascular dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes in critically ill children.
Objective: We aim to derive an evidence-informed, consensus-based definition of cardiovascular dysfunction in critically ill children.
Data sources: Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020 using medical subject heading terms and text words to define concepts of cardiovascular dysfunction, pediatric critical illness, and outcomes of interest.
Study selection: Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with cardiovascular dysfunction and assessment and/or scoring tools to screen for cardiovascular dysfunction and assessed mortality, functional status, organ-specific, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies of adults, premature infants (≤36 weeks gestational age), animals, reviews and/or commentaries, case series (sample size ≤10), and non-English-language studies were excluded. Studies of children with cyanotic congenital heart disease or cardiovascular dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded.
Data extraction: Data were abstracted from each eligible study into a standard data extraction form, along with risk-of-bias assessment by a task force member.
Results: Cardiovascular dysfunction was defined by 9 elements, including 4 which indicate severe cardiovascular dysfunction. Cardiopulmonary arrest (>5 minutes) or mechanical circulatory support independently define severe cardiovascular dysfunction, whereas tachycardia, hypotension, vasoactive-inotropic score, lactate, troponin I, central venous oxygen saturation, and echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction were included in any combination. There was expert agreement (>80%) on the definition.
Limitations: All included studies were observational and many were retrospective.
Conclusions: The Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate panel propose this evidence-informed definition of cardiovascular dysfunction.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Conflict of interest statement
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Jain A, Sankar J, Anubhuti A, et al. Prevalence and Outcome of Sepsis-induced Myocardial Dysfunction in Children with ‘Sepsis’ ‘With’ and ‘Without Shock’-A Prospective Observational Study. J Trop Pediatr 2018;64(6):501–9. - PubMed
-
- Ackland GL, Iqbal S, Paredes LG, et al. Individualised oxygen delivery targeted haemodynamic therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled, mechanistic trial. Lancet Respir Med 2015;3(1):33–41. - PubMed
-
- Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020;21(2):e52–e106. - PubMed
-
- Topjian AA, de Caen A, Wainwright MS, et al. Pediatric Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019;140(6):e194–e233. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
