Genetic evidence for vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: choice of variants is critical
- PMID: 34972215
- PMCID: PMC7614342
- DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab870
Genetic evidence for vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: choice of variants is critical
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to: Genetic evidence for vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: choice of variants is critical.Eur Heart J. 2022 Jul 21;43(28):2659. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac070. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID: 35146516 No abstract available.
Abstract
Contrasting findings from Mendelian randomization analyses performed using a polygenic choice of genetic variants (that is, all genome-wide significant predictors of 25-hydroxyvitamin D) to those using a focused choice of genetic variants (that is, variants in four gene regions related to vitamin D synthesis and metabolism).
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment on
-
Non-linear Mendelian randomization analyses support a role for vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular disease risk.Eur Heart J. 2022 May 7;43(18):1731-1739. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab809. Eur Heart J. 2022. Retraction in: Eur Heart J. 2025 Apr 15;46(15):1456. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf081. PMID: 34891159 Retracted.
-
Corrigendum to: Genetic evidence for vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: choice of variants is critical.Eur Heart J. 2022 Jul 21;43(28):2659. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac070. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID: 35146516 No abstract available.
References
-
- Didelez V, Sheehan N. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007;16:309–330. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
