Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;150(6):4511.
doi: 10.1121/10.0009033.

Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production

Affiliations

Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production

Zhaoyan Zhang. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

In this study we investigated the effect of sex- and age-related differences in vocal fold length, thickness, and depth on voice production in a three-dimensional vocal fold model. The results showed that the cause-effect relationships between vocal fold physiology and voice production previously identified in an adult male-like vocal fold geometry remained qualitatively the same in vocal folds with geometry representative of adult females and children. We further showed that the often-observed differences in voice production between adult males, adult females, and children can be explained by differences in length and thickness. The lower F0, higher flow rate, larger vocal fold vibration amplitude, and higher sound pressure level (SPL) in adult males as compared to adult females and children can be explained by differences in vocal fold length. In contrast, the thickness effect dominated and contributed to the larger closed quotient of vocal fold vibration, larger normalized maximum flow declination rate, and lower H1-H2 in adult males as compared to adult females and children. The effect of differences in vocal fold depth was generally small. When targeting a specific SPL, adult males experienced a lower peak vocal fold contact pressure during phonation than adult females and children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The three-dimensional vocal fold model and key geometric control parameters, including the vocal fold length L along the anterior-posterior direction, vertical thickness of the medial surface T, body-layer and cover-layer depths Db and Dc, and the initial glottal angle α.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
The mean values of selected output measures as a function of vocal fold length.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(Color online) Probability of the F0 at different values of vertical thickness T. Thinner vocal folds generally produced higher F0.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
The mean values of selected output measures for vocal fold conditions representative of children, adult females, and adult males (see text for details of these vocal fold conditions).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alipour, F. , Berry, D. A. , and Titze, I. R. (2000). “ A finite-element model of vocal-fold vibration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108(6), 3003–3012.10.1121/1.1324678 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alipour-Haghighi, F. , and Titze, I. R. (1991). “ Elastic models of vocal fold tissues,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90(3), 1326–1331.10.1121/1.401924 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alku, P. , Bäckström, T. , and Vilkman, E. (2002). “ Normalized amplitude quotient for parametrization of the glottal flow,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(2), 701–710.10.1121/1.1490365 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awan, S. N. , Giovinco, A. , and Owens, J. (2012). “ Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice,” J. Voice 26(5), 670.e15–670.e20.10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishop, J. , and Keating, P. (2012). “ Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: Fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132(2), 1100–1112.10.1121/1.4714351 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types