Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan-Feb;36(1):30-39.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.12673.

Revision of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Weight Loss or Weight Regain

Affiliations
Review

Revision of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Weight Loss or Weight Regain

Andreas Alexandrou et al. In Vivo. 2022 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Inadequate weight loss or weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) occurs in more than a quarter of patients for various reasons. Available remedying treatment options include endoscopic and surgical techniques for revision of the gastric pouch and the gastro-jejunal anastomosis, conversion of standard to distal gastric bypass (DRYGBP) or the conversion of RYGBP to biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) or duodenal switch (DS). There is quite a variability concerning the technical simplicity, safety, and effectiveness of these techniques and the small number of patients in the numerous single-center reports precludes any meaningful comparisons. This review aimed to describe all available methods and present the advantages and disadvantages of each of them, to facilitate, rather than guide, the decision of the average bariatric surgeon who encounters such a patient.

Keywords: Obesity; gastric bypass; outcomes; review; revisional surgery; weight regain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distalization of the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Gastro-jejunostomy anastomosis revision.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Gastric pouch banding.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Division of the gastro-jejunostomy, gastrogastric anastomosis, sleeve gastrectomy.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Conversion of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to biliopancreatic diversion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phillips BT, Shikora SA. The history of metabolic and bariatric surgery: Development of standards for patient safety and efficacy. Metabolism. 2018;79:97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Böckelman C, Hahl T, Victorzon M. Mortality following bariatric surgery compared to other common operations in Finland during a 5-year period (2009-2013). A Nationwide Registry Study. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2444–2451. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2664-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duvoisin C, Favre L, Allemann P, Fournier P, Demartines N, Suter M. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Ten-year results in a cohort of 658 patients. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):1019–1025. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002538. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlin AM, Zeni TM, English WJ, Hawasli AA, Genaw JA, Krause KR, Schram JL, Kole KL, Finks JF, Birkmeyer JD, Share D, Birkmeyer NJ, Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):791–797. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182879ded. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel K, Askari A, Mamidanna R, Jain V, Adil T. Long-term BAROS scores and independent obesity-related co-morbidity predictors of failure after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(12):1954–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.037. - DOI - PubMed