How supportive are workplace environments for sitting less and moving more? A descriptive study of Australian workplaces participating in the BeUpstanding program
- PMID: 34976672
- PMCID: PMC8684026
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101616
How supportive are workplace environments for sitting less and moving more? A descriptive study of Australian workplaces participating in the BeUpstanding program
Abstract
Desk-based workers are highly sedentary; this has been identified as an emerging work health and safety issue. To reduce workplace sitting time and promote physical activity it is important to understand what factors are already present within workplaces to inform future interventions. This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of supportive environmental factors, prior to workplaces taking part in a 'sit less, move more' initiative (BeUpstanding). Participants were 291 Australian-based workplace champions (representing 230 organisations) who unlocked the BeUpstanding program's online toolkit between September 2017 and mid-November 2020, and who completed surveys relating to champion characteristics, organisation and workplace characteristics, and the availability of environmental factors to support sitting less and moving more. Factors were characterized using descriptive statistics and compared across key sectors and factor categories (spatial; resources/initiatives; policy/cultural) using mixed logistic regression models. Of the 42 factors measured, only 11 were present in > 50% of workplaces. Spatial design factors were more likely to be present than resources/initiatives or policy/cultural factors. Centralised printers were the most commonly reported attribute (94%), while prompts to encourage stair use were the least common (4%). Most workplace factors with < 50% prevalence were modifiable and/or were considered modifiable with low cost. Organisations that were public sector, not small/medium, not regional/remote, and not blue-collar had higher odds of having supportive factors than their counterparts; however, workplaces varied considerably in the number of factors present. These findings can assist with developing and targeting initiatives and promoting feasible strategies for desk-based workers to sit less and move more.
Keywords: Cross-sectional; Culture; Environment supports; Health Promotion; Physical activity; Policy; Sedentary Time; Spatial; Workplace; Workstation.
© 2021 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
National implementation trial of BeUpstanding™: an online initiative for workers to sit less and move more.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 30;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01652-0. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024. PMID: 39350268 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Feasibility and Pre-Post Impact Evaluation of the Beta (Test) Version of the BeUpstanding Champion Toolkit in Reducing Workplace Sitting: Pilot Study.JMIR Form Res. 2018 Aug 28;2(2):e17. doi: 10.2196/formative.9343. JMIR Form Res. 2018. PMID: 30684420 Free PMC article.
-
Supporting Workers to Sit Less and Move More Through the Web-Based BeUpstanding Program: Protocol for a Single-Arm, Repeated Measures Implementation Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 May 4;9(5):e15756. doi: 10.2196/15756. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. PMID: 32364513 Free PMC article.
-
Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 17;2019(11):CD012487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012487.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31742666 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of reducing occupational sitting: review and thematic synthesis.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Sep 18;15(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0718-9. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018. PMID: 30227861 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Usage and effectiveness of strategies to sit less and move more: evaluation of the BeUpstanding™ national implementation trial.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 May 28;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01761-4. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025. PMID: 40437510 Free PMC article.
-
Breaking the chain from the chair: a manager's perspective on reducing employees sedentary time in a home-office context.BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):1079. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22184-7. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40114077 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedentary behaviour interventions in offices to reduce sitting time in Australian desk-based workers: A modelling study.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287710. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37384626 Free PMC article.
-
Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up: A Critical Reflection on Physical Activity Promotion.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114284. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36361159 Free PMC article.
-
Non-adherence to the World Health Organization's physical activity recommendations and associated factors among healthy adults in urban centers of Southwest Ethiopia.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;3(1):e0001451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001451. eCollection 2023. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36962928 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006. Australia and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification.
-
- Goode A.D., Hadgraft N.T., Neuhaus M., Healy G.N. Perceptions of an online ‘train-the-champion’ approach to increase workplace movement. Health Promot Int. 2019;34(6):1179–1190. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources