Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb:13:100268.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region

Marzia Lazzerini  1 , Benedetta Covi  1 , Ilaria Mariani  1 , Zalka Drglin  2 , Maryse Arendt  3 , Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg  4 , Helen Elden  5   6 , Raquel Costa  7   8   9 , Daniela Drandić  10 , Jelena Radetić  11 , Marina Ruxandra Otelea  12   13 , Céline Miani  14 , Serena Brigidi  15 , Virginie Rozée  16 , Barbara Mihevc Ponikvar  2 , Barbara Tasch  3   17 , Sigrun Kongslien  18 , Karolina Linden  5 , Catarina Barata  19 , Magdalena Kurbanović  20 , Jovana Ružičić  11 , Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort  14 , Lara Martín Castañeda  21 , Elise de La Rochebrochard  16 , Anja Bohinec  2 , Eline Skirnisdottir Vik  22 , Mehreen Zaigham  23 , Teresa Santos  24   25 , Lisa Wandschneider  14 , Ana Canales Viver  26 , Amira Ćerimagić  27 , Emma Sacks  28 , Emanuelle Pessa Valente  1 ; IMAgiNE EURO study group
Affiliations

Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region

Marzia Lazzerini et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking.

Methods: Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures.

Findings: 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers' number as "insufficient". Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes.

Interpretation: Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed.

Funding: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.

Keywords: COVID-19; European Region; WHO; facility; maternal; newborn; quality of care; questionnaire; respectful maternity care; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Céline Miani's position as a post-doctoral researcher is funded by Bielefeld University. Catarina Barata had a PhD grant FCT/FSE (SFRH/BD/128600/2017) while she was voluntarily writing this article. She is board member, unpaid collaboration, of Associação Portuguesa pelos Direitos da Mulher na Gravidez e Parto (APDMGP). Daniela Drandić received a salary during the time she was volunteer-writing this article was from a grant from the Erasmus+ programme of the European Commission, regarding a project on parenting support and from a grant from the UNICEF Croatia, regarding a project on online education for pregnant women during COVID. She is a board member of an NGO called Human Rights in Childbirth, and has been for the entire time she worked on this paper. Dr Emma Sacks has received research funding from the World Health Organization related to the mistreatment of women and newborns in health facilities. The project has no impact on the present manuscript outside of similar topics. She is the former co-chair of the Newborn Health Working Group of the Global Respectful Maternity Care Council. Other authors have none to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram - Note: We used 45 key variables (40 key Quality Measures and five key socio-demographic questions).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Provision of care – Notes: Data are reported as median frequency on the total sample (grey dot) and as median frequency on the sample of women giving birth in each country (coloured dots); horizontal grey line represents the range of the median frequencies. All the indicators in the domain of provision of care are directly based on WHO standards. Indicators identified with letters (eg, 3a, 3b) were tailored to take into account different mode of birth (ie, spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal, and caesarean section). These were calculated on subsamples (eg, 3a was calculated on spontaneous vaginal births; 3b was calculated on instrumental vaginal births). Abbreviations: CS = caesarean section; HCP = health care provider; IVB= instrumental vaginal birth; SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experience of care – Notes: Data are reported as median frequency on the total sample (grey dot) and as median frequency on the sample of women giving birth in each country (coloured dots); horizontal grey line represents the range of the median frequencies. All the indicators in the domain of experience of care are directly based on WHO standards. Indicators identified with letters (eg, 2a, 2b) were tailored to take into account different mode of birth (ie, spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal, and caesarean section). These were calculated on subsamples (eg, 2a was calculated on spontaneous vaginal births; 2b was calculated on instrumental vaginal births). Abbreviations: ECS = emergency caesarean section; HCP = health care provider; IVB= instrumental vaginal birth; SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Availability of physical and human resources – Notes: Data are reported as median frequency on the total sample (grey dot) and as median frequency on the sample of women giving birth in each country (coloured dots); horizontal grey line represents the range of the median frequencies. All the indicators in the domain of resources are directly based on WHO standards. Abbreviations: HCP = health care provider.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Reorganizational changes due to COVID-19 – Notes: Data are reported as median frequency on the total sample (grey dot) and as median frequency on the sample of women giving birth in each country (coloured dots); horizontal grey line represents the range of the median frequencies. Indicator 6 in both panels was defined as: at least one functioning and accessible hand-washing station (near or inside the room where the mother was hospitalised) supplied with water and soap or with disinfectant alcohol solution. Abbreviations: HCP = health care provider; PPE = personal protective equipment; QMNC = quality of maternal and newborn care.
Figure 6
Figure 6
QMNC Index by country of giving birth - Abbreviations: QMNC = quality of maternal and newborn care.
Figure 7
Figure 7
QMNC Index by other variables used in quantile regression analysis - Abbreviations: CS = caesarean section; IVB = instrumental vaginal birth; OB-GYN = obstetrics and gynaecology; QMNC = quality of maternal and newborn care; SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, Kalafat E, van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I, O'Brien P, Morris E, Draycott T, Thangaratinam S, Le Doare K, Ladhani S, von Dadelszen P, Magee L, Khalil A. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 S2214-109X(21)00079-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kc A, Gurung R, Kinney MV, Sunny AK, Moinuddin M, Basnet O, Paudel P, Bhattarai P, Subedi K, Shrestha MP, Lawn JE, Målqvist M. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a prospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(10):e1273–e1281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceulemans M, Verbakel JY, Van Calsteren K, Eerdekens A, Allegaert K, Foulon V. SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Results from an Observational Study in Primary Care in Belgium. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186766. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ravaldi C, Wilson A, Ricca V, Homer C, Vannacci A. Pregnant women voice their concerns and birth expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Women Birth. 2020 Jul 13 doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.002. S1871-5192(20)30280-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naurin E, Markstedt E, Stolle D, Enström D, Wallin A, Andreasson I, Attebo B, Eriksson O, Martinsson K, Elden H, Linden K, Sengpiel V. Pregnant under the pressure of a pandemic: a large-scale longitudinal survey before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31(1):7–13. 6000. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data