Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 6;51(1):afab252.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab252.

The feasibility and acceptability of assessing and managing sarcopenia and frailty among older people with upper limb fracture

Kinda Ibrahim  1 , Mark A Mullee  2 , Natalie Cox  3 , Cynthia Russell  4 , Mark Baxter  5 , Simon Tilley  6 , Guiqing Lily Yao  7 , Shihua Zhu  2 , Helen C Roberts  8
Affiliations

The feasibility and acceptability of assessing and managing sarcopenia and frailty among older people with upper limb fracture

Kinda Ibrahim et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: sarcopenia and frailty are associated with increased risk of falls and fractures. This study evaluated the feasibility of assessing sarcopenia and frailty among older people attending fracture clinics.

Methods: patients aged 65+ years with an arm fracture attending fracture clinics in one UK city were recruited. Sarcopenia was assessed using gait speed, grip strength, skeletal muscle mass index SMI, SARC-F questionnaire and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) I and II criteria. Frailty was assessed using Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP), FRAIL scale, PRISMA-7, electronic Frailty Index (e-FI), Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) and Study of Osteoporotic Fracture. The sensitivity and specificity of each tool was calculated against the EWGSOP II criteria (sarcopenia) and FFP (frailty). Patients identified to have either condition were referred for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Interviews with 13 patients and nine staff explored the acceptability of this process.

Results: hundred patients (Mean age 75 years) were recruited. Most sarcopenia and frailty assessments were quick with complete data collection and were acceptable to patients and staff. Sarcopenia was identified among 4-39% participants depending on the tool and frailty among 9-25%. Both conditions were more common among men than women with all tools. The SARC-F and PRISMA-7 had the best sensitivity (100 and 93%, respectively) and specificity (96 and 87%). CGA among 80% of referred participants led to three interventions per participant (e.g. medication changes and investigations).

Conclusion: SARC-F and PRISMA-7 are recommended for use in fracture clinics to screen for sarcopenia and frailty.

Keywords: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; feasibility; fragility fracture; frailty; older people; sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study recruitment Consort diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Donald IP, Bulpitt CJ. The prognosis of falls in elderly people living at home. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 121–5. - PubMed
    1. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A. The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteop Int 2001; 12: 417–27. - PubMed
    1. van Geel TA, van Helden S, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Dinant GJ. Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 99–102. - PubMed
    1. Ravindrarajah R, Hazra NC, Charlton J, Jackson SHD, Dregan A, Gulliford MC. Incidence and mortality of fractures by frailty level over 80 years of age: cohort study using UK electronic health records. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e018836. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong RMY, Wong H, Zhang N et al. The relationship between sarcopenia and fragility fracture-a systematic review. Osteop Int 2019; 30: 541–53. - PubMed

Publication types