Evaluation of low-volume plasma sampling for the analysis of meropenem in clinical samples
- PMID: 34981148
- DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03851-1
Evaluation of low-volume plasma sampling for the analysis of meropenem in clinical samples
Abstract
Reducing the volume of blood sampled from neonatal or paediatric patients is important to facilitate research in a group that is under-represented in clinical studies. Not all patients have a cannula available for blood sampling, meaning there are real advantages in obtaining a blood microsample by skin prick. In this study, the results obtained from both capillary microsamples (CMS) and a microfluidic (MF)-CMS by skin prick are compared to conventional plasma sampled from an arterial catheter in a clinical bridging study. Six critically ill patients receiving meropenem were included with the incurred sample reanalysis test meeting the acceptance criteria for both CMS (n = 24 samples) and MF-CMS (n = 20 samples). Bland-Altman plots comparing MF-CMS to conventional arterial blood sampling revealed a difference of - 12.7 ± 22.1% (mean ± standard deviation (SD), and comparing CMS to conventional arterial blood sampling a difference of - 3.4 ± 17.0%. At - 12.7%, the bias between MF-CMS and conventional sampling is greater than the bias found with CMS, although within the limit of acceptability for analytical accuracy (that being ± 15%). Samples collected by skin prick and using CMS produced meropenem concentrations that were comparable to those obtained from conventional arterial catheter sampling. CMS samples were found to be stable when stored in the capillary tube for 24 h at 5 °C or for 4 h at room temperature.
Keywords: Antibiotic; Capillary; Meropenem; Microsampling; Wing.
© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Altamimi MI, Choonara I, Sammons H. Invasiveness of pharmacokinetic studies in children: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7): e010484. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010484 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Abdul-Aziz MH, Alffenaar J-WC, Bassetti M, Bracht H, Dimopoulos G, Marriott D, Neely MN, Paiva J-A, Pea F, Sjovall F, Timsit JF, Udy AA, Wicha SG, Zeitlinger M, De Waele JJ, Roberts JA, the Infection Section of European Society of Intensive Care M, Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, Critically Ill Patient Study Groups of European Society of Clinical M, Infectious D, Infectious Diseases Group of International Association of Therapeutic Drug M, Clinical T, Infections in the ICU, Sepsis Working Group of International Society of Antimicrobial C. Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper#. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1127–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06050-1 . - DOI
-
- Denniff P, Spooner N. Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling: A Dried Sample Collection Technique for Quantitative Bioanalysis. Anal Chem. 2014;86(16):8489–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5022562 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Velghe S, Stove CP. Evaluation of the Capitainer-B Microfluidic Device as a New Hematocrit-Independent Alternative for Dried Blood Spot Collection. Anal Chem. 2018;90(21):12893–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03512 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jonsson O, Steffen AC, Sundquist VS, Janson J, Martinsson S, Maatta U, Emanuelsson AB. Capillary microsampling and analysis of 4-microl blood, plasma and serum samples to determine human alpha-synuclein elimination rate in mice. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(4):449–62. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.12.337 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources