Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Aug;37(10):2541-2547.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07307-1. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure

Duc M Ha et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Dyspnea is a common and debilitating symptom that affects many different patient populations. Dyspnea measures should assess multiple domains.

Objective: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an ultra-brief, multi-dimensional dyspnea measure.

Design: We adapted the DEG from the PEG, a valid 3-item pain measure, to assess average dyspnea intensity (D), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and dyspnea burden with general activity (G).

Participants: We used data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial among outpatients with heart failure.

Main measures: We evaluated reliability (Cronbach's alpha), concurrent validity with the Memorial-Symptom-Assessment-Scale (MSAS) shortness-of-breath distress-orbothersome item and 7-item Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder (GAD-7) scale, knowngroups validity with New-York-Heart-Association-Functional-Classification (NYHA) 1-2 or 3-4 and presence or absence of comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), responsiveness with the MSAS item as an anchor, and calculated a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using distribution methods.

Key results: Among 312 participants, the DEG was reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.92). The mean (standard deviation) DEG score was 5.26 (2.36) (range 0-10) points. DEG scores correlated strongly with the MSAS shortness of breath distress-or-bothersome item (r=0.66) and moderately with GAD-7 categories (ρ=0.36). DEG scores were statistically significantly lower among patients with NYHA 1-2 compared to 3-4 [mean difference (standard error): 1.22 (0.27) points, p<0.01], and those without compared to with comorbid COPD [0.87 (0.27) points, p<0.01]. The DEG was highly sensitive to change, with MCID of 0.59-1.34 points, or 11-25% change.

Conclusions: The novel, ultra-brief DEG measure is reliable, valid, and highly responsive. Future studies should evaluate the DEG's sensitivity to interventions, use anchor-based methods to triangulate MCID estimates, and determine its prognostic usefulness among patients with chronic cardiopulmonary and other diseases.

Keywords: Patient-reported outcome measure; cardiopulmonary disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dyspnea; heart failure; psychometrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dyspnea, enjoyment of life, general activity (DEG) measure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of DEG scores. DEG = dyspnea, enjoyment of life, general activity measure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Concurrent validity of the DEG. A With the MSAS shortness-of-breath distress-or-bothersome item (r = 0.66, p < 0.01); B with GAD-7 anxiety levels (ρ = 0.36, p < 0.01). DEG = dyspnea, enjoyment of life, general activity measure; GAD-7 = 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale; MSAS = Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Known-group validity of the DEG. A By NYHA classification [mean difference (standard error) = 1.22 (0.27) points, p < 0.01]; B by presence or absence of COPD [mean difference (standard error) = 0.87 (0.27) points, p < 0.01]. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DEG = Dyspnea, Enjoyment of life, General activity measure; NYHA = New York Heart Association.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(4):435–452. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201111-2042ST. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laviolette L, Laveneziana P, Faculty ERSRS Dyspnoea: a multidimensional and multidisciplinary approach. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(6):1750–1762. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00092613. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banzett RB, Moosavi SH. Measuring dyspnoea: new multidimensional instruments to match our 21st century understanding. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1602473. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02473-2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massart A, Hunt DP. Management of Refractory Breathlessness: a Review for General Internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(4):1035–1040. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06439-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendriks SA, Smalbrugge M, Galindo-Garre F, Hertogh CM, van der Steen JT. From admission to death: prevalence and course of pain, agitation, and shortness of breath, and treatment of these symptoms in nursing home residents with dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(6):475–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.12.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms