Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;37(14):3554-3561.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07199-1. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

Frailty and Survival After In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Frances Y Hu  1 , Shoshana Streiter  2 , Lynne O'Mara  3 , Stephanie M Sison  4 , Olga Theou  5 , Rachelle Bernacki  6 , Ariela Orkaby  2   7
Affiliations

Frailty and Survival After In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Frances Y Hu et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Older adults face high mortality following resuscitation efforts for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Less is known about the role of frailty in survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Objective: To investigate whether frailty, measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale, is associated with mortality after cardiopulmonary resuscitation following in-hospital cardiac arrest in older adults in the USA.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Participants: Patients ≥ 65 years who had undergone cardiopulmonary resuscitation during an inpatient admission at two urban academic hospitals and three suburban community hospitals within a Boston area healthcare system from January 2018-January 2020. Patients with Clinical Frailty Scale scores 1-3 were considered not frail, 4-6 were considered very mildly, mildly, and moderately frail, respectively, and 7-9 were considered severely frail.

Main measures: In-hospital mortality after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Key results: Among 324 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation following in-hospital cardiac arrest, 73.1% experienced in-hospital mortality. Patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 1-3 had 54% in-hospital mortality, which increased to 66%, 78%, 84%, and 84% for those with a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 4, 5, 6, and 7-9, respectively (p = 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, race, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, higher frailty scores were significantly associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality. Compared to those with a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 1-3, odds ratios (95% CI) for in-hospital mortality for patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale score of 4, 5, 6, and 7-9 were 1.6 (0.8-3.3), 3.0 (1.3-7.1), 4.4 (1.9-9.9), and 4.6 (1.8-11.8), respectively (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Higher levels of frailty are associated with increased mortality after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older adults. Clinicians may consider using the Clinical Frailty Scale to help guide goals of care conversations, including discussion of code status, in this patient population.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; frailty; geriatrics; goals of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient selection. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation;CFS, Clinical Frailty Scale.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Association between Clinical Frailty Scale Score and in-hospital mortality in older adults undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.CFS, Clinical Frailty Scale.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Algorithm for retrospective calculation of Clinical Frailty Scale score using electronic medical record. bADL, basic activity of daily living; iADL, independent activity of daily living.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Berg KM, Donnino MW, Granfeldt A. In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review. JAMA. 2019;321(12):1200–1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paladino J, Lakin JR, Sanders JJ. Communication Strategies for Sharing Prognostic Information With Patients: Beyond Survival Statistics. JAMA. 2019;322(14):1345–1346. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11533. - DOI - PubMed
    1. White DB, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Lo B, Curtis JR. Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):442–448. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000254723.28270.14. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy DJ, Burrows D, Santilli S, et al. The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(8):545–549. doi: 10.1056/nejm199402243300807. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandroni C, Nolan J, Cavallaro F, Antonelli M. In-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, prognosis and possible measures to improve survival. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(2):237–245. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0326-z. - DOI - PubMed