Heterogeneity in Exophthalmometry in Ethiopian Populations and its Clinical Significance
- PMID: 34982068
- DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002073
Heterogeneity in Exophthalmometry in Ethiopian Populations and its Clinical Significance
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment on
-
Normative Exophthalmometry Measurements Vary Among Ethiopian Adults and the Major Ethiopian Ethnic Groups.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec;36(6):601-604. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001670. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 32467519
References
-
- Heisel CJ, Garza PS, Fashe CM, et al. Normative exophthalmometry measurements vary among Ethiopian adults and the major Ethiopian ethnic groups. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;36:601–604.
-
- Chang AA, Bank A, Francis IC, et al. Clinical exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Luedde and Hertel exophthalmometers. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:315–318.
-
- Cole HP III, Couvillion JT, Fink AJ, et al. Exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Naugle and Hertel instruments. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;13:189–194.
-
- Ameri H, Fenton S. Comparison of unilateral and simultaneous bilateral measurement of the globe position, using the Hertel exophthalmometer. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:448–451.
-
- Delmas J, Loustau JM, Martin S, et al. Comparative study of 3 exophthalmometers and computed tomographic biometry. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:144–149.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources