Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 4;15(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00399-w.

Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review

Neha Potla et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with alteplase is the currently approved therapy for patients who present within 4.5 h of symptom onset and meet criteria. Recently, there has been interest in the thrombolytic tenecteplase, a modified version of alteplase, due to its lower cost, ease of administration, and studies reporting better outcomes when compared to alteplase. This systematic review compares the efficacy of tenecteplase vs. alteplase with regard to three outcomes: (1) rate of symptomatic hemorrhage, (2) functional outcome at 90 days, and (3) reperfusion grade after thrombectomy to compare the efficacy of both thrombolytics in AIS METHODS: The search was conducted in August 2021 in PubMed, filtered for randomized controlled trials, and studies in English. The main search term was "tenecteplase for acute stroke."

Results: A total of 6 randomized clinical trials including 1675 patients with AIS was included. No one's study compared alteplase to tenecteplase with all three outcomes after acute ischemic stroke; however, by using a combination of the results, this systematic review summarizes whether tenecteplase outperforms alteplase.

Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that tenecteplase appears to be a better thrombolytic agent for acute ischemic stroke when compared to alteplase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for inclusion of studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias by individual study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk of bias by percentage across all included studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581–7. 10.1056/NEJM199512143332401. - PubMed
    1. Miller DJ, Simpson JR, Silver B. Safety of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a review of complications, risk factors, and newer technologies. Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(3):138–147. doi: 10.1177/1941875211408731. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ingall TJ, O'Fallon WM, Asplund K, et al. Findings from the reanalysis of the NINDS tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke treatment trial. Stroke. 2004;35(10):2418–2424. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000140891.70547.56. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chernyshev OY, Martin-Schild S, Albright KC, Barreto A, Misra V, Acosta I, Grotta JC, Savitz SI. Safety of tPA in stroke mimics and neuroimaging-negative cerebral ischemia. Neurology. 2010;74(17):1340–1345. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dad5a6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordt TK, Bode C. Thrombolysis: newer thrombolytic agents and their role in clinical medicine. Heart. 2003;89(11):1358–1362. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.11.1358. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources