Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03645-w.

Group problem management plus (PM+) to decrease psychological distress among Syrian refugees in Turkey: a pilot randomised controlled trial

C Acarturk  1 , E Uygun  2 , Z Ilkkursun  3 , T Yurtbakan  4 , G Kurt  3 , J Adam-Troian  5 , I Senay  6 , R Bryant  7 , P Cuijpers  8 , N Kiselev  9 , D McDaid  10 , N Morina  9 , Z Nisanci  11 , A L Park  10 , M Sijbrandij  8 , P Ventevogel  12 , D C Fuhr  13
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Group problem management plus (PM+) to decrease psychological distress among Syrian refugees in Turkey: a pilot randomised controlled trial

C Acarturk et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Syrian refugees resettled in Turkey show a high prevalence of symptoms of mental disorders. Problem Management Plus (PM+) is an effective psychological intervention delivered by non-specialist health care providers which has shown to decrease psychological distress among people exposed to adversity. In this single-blind pilot randomised controlled trial, we examined the methodological trial procedures of Group PM+ (gPM+) among Syrian refugees with psychological distress in Istanbul, Turkey, and assessed feasibility, acceptability, perceived impact and the potential cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

Methods: Refugees with psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10 > 15) and impaired psychosocial functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0 > 16) were recruited from the community and randomised to either gPM+ and enhanced care as usual (E-CAU) (n = 24) or E-CAU only (n = 22). gPM+ comprised of five weekly group sessions with eight to ten participants per group. Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention were assessed through semi-structured interviews. The primary outcome at 3-month follow-up was symptoms of depression and anxiety (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25). Psychosocial functioning (WHODAS 2.0), symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and self-identified problems (Psychological Outcomes Profiles, PSYCHLOPS) were included as secondary outcomes. A modified version of the Client Service Receipt Inventory was used to document changes in the costs of health service utilisation as well as productivity losses.

Results: There were no barriers experienced in recruiting study participants and in randomising them into the respective study arms. Retention in gPM+ was high (75%). Qualitative analyses of the interviews with the participants showed that Syrian refugees had a positive view on the content, implementation and format of gPM+. No adverse events were reported during the implementation. The study was not powered to detect an effect. No significant difference between gPM+ and E-CAU group on primary and secondary outcome measures, or in economic impacts were found.

Conclusions: gPM+ delivered by non-specialist peer providers seemed to be an acceptable, feasible and safe intervention for Syrian refugees in Turkey with elevated levels of psychological distress. This pilot RCT sets the stage for a fully powered RCT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03567083 ; date: 25/06/2018.

Keywords: Common mental health problems; Feasibility; Group intervention; Pilot; Randomised controlled trial; Refugees; Task sharing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort Flow Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. United Nations high commissioner for refugees. Figures at a Glance 2020. https://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html. Accessed 24 Jun 2020.
    1. UNHCR. Operational Update October 2020. p. 2020.
    1. UNHCR. Syria regional refugee response. Opetaional Portal Refugee Situations. 2020; https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria#_ga=2.218907088.858158040.15.... Accessed 24 Jun 2020.
    1. Alpak G, Unal A, Bulbul F, Sagaltici E, Bez Y, Altindag A, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder among Syrian refugees in Turkey: a cross-sectional study. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2015. - PubMed
    1. Georgiadou E, Zbidat A, Schmitt GM, Erim Y. Prevalence of mental distress among Syrian refugees with residence permission in Germany: a registry-based study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00393. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data