Usefulness of random-start progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
- PMID: 34983605
- PMCID: PMC8725433
- DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00935-5
Usefulness of random-start progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
Abstract
Background: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has been used in infertility cases in recent years, and several reports have stated that it has oocyte collection results similar to those of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. For emergency fertility preservation, random-start ovarian stimulation is usually recommended. Therefore we compared the clinical outcomes of random-start PPOS with those of conventional random-start GnRH-ant protocols in fertility-preserving cases.
Methods: We retrospectively examined 86 cycles of oocyte collection, of which 56 were random-start GnRH-ant and 30 were random-start PPOS for fertility preservation at our hospital between January 2016 and April 2021. The primary outcome was the number of mature oocytes per cycle. The secondary outcome was the number of vitrified blastocysts per cycle for embryo freezing cases.
Results: No significant differences were noted in the number of days of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin preparation, and the number of mature oocytes and vitrified blastocysts. The number of hospital visits for monitoring was significantly lower in the PPOS group. The start of menstruation before oocyte collection was significantly less in the PPOS group.
Conclusions: Random-start PPOS and GnRH-ant were similar in oocyte collection results. PPOS can reduce the number of hospital visits, thus reducing patient stress. PPOS at the start of the luteal phase can prevent the start of menstruation during ovarian stimulation.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Dydrogesterone; Fertility preservation; Letrozole; Ovarian stimulation.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: A retrospective non-Inferiority study comparing Dienogest in the PPOS protocol to antagonist and agonist protocols.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025 Jun;54(6):102950. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102950. Epub 2025 Apr 3. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025. PMID: 40187738 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes and cost-effectiveness comparisons of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation, GnRH antagonist protocol, and luteal phase stimulation for fertility preservation.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;163(2):645-650. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14903. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37265085
-
Comparison of cumulative live birth rates between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in different populations.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 18;14:1117513. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1117513. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37143731 Free PMC article.
-
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Apr;311(4):1181-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07918-z. Epub 2025 Feb 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39945792 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;27(3):215-21. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000180. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25919235 Review.
Cited by
-
Serum concentrations of medroxyprogesterone acetate were undetectable on OPU+5 days and had no effect on the serum progesterone level in patients undergoing the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 14;16:1490839. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1490839. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40438399 Free PMC article.
-
The construction of machine learning-based predictive models for high-quality embryo formation in poor ovarian response patients with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Jul 10;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01251-5. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38987797 Free PMC article.
-
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women with cancer: A comparative study.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 28;18(3):e0280238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280238. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36976781 Free PMC article.
-
Meeting proceedings: International Society for Fertility Preservation Tokyo, 15-17 November, 2024.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May;42(5):1363-1383. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03478-6. Epub 2025 Apr 23. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 40266419
-
A comparison of the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03612-4. Online ahead of print. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 40775480 Review.
References
-
- La Marca A, Capuzzo M, Sacchi S, Imbrogno MG, Spinella F, Varricchio MT, Minasi MG, Greco P, Fiorentino F, Greco E. Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1325–1331. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa068. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous