Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;158(2):176-183.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.5390.

Clinical Characteristics, Disease Course, and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis in the US

Affiliations

Clinical Characteristics, Disease Course, and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis in the US

Andrew Creadore et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Erratum in

  • doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0056

Abstract

Importance: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, severe cutaneous adverse reaction associated with systemic complications. Currently available data are largely limited to small retrospective case series.

Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics, disease course, and outcomes of a heterogeneous group of patients with AGEP across the US.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective review of a case series of patients was conducted from January 1, 2000, through July 31, 2020. All 340 included cases throughout 10 academic health systems in the US were scored retrospectively using the EuroSCAR scoring system, and patients with a score corresponding to probable or definite AGEP and aged 18 years or older were included.

Main outcomes and measures: Patient demographic characteristics, clinical course, suspected causative agent, treatment, and short- and long-term outcomes.

Results: Most of the 340 included patients were women (214 [62.9%]), White (206 [60.6%]), and non-Hispanic (239 [70.3%]); mean (SD) age was 57.8 (17.4) years. A total of 154 of 310 patients (49.7%) had a temperature greater than or equal to 38.0 °C that lasted for a median of 2 (IQR, 1-4) days. Of 309 patients, 263 (85.1%) developed absolute neutrophilia and 161 patients (52.1%) developed either absolute or relative eosinophilia. Suspected causes of AGEP were medications (291 [85.6%]), intravenous contrast agents (7 [2.1%]), infection (3 [0.9%]), or unknown (39 [11.5%]). In 151 cases in which a single medication was identified, 63 (41.7%) were β-lactam antimicrobials, 51 (33.8%) were non-β-lactam antimicrobials, 9 (6.0%) were anticonvulsants, and 5 (3.3%) were calcium channel blockers. The median time from medication initiation to AGEP start date was 3 (IQR, 1-9) days. Twenty-five of 298 patients (8.4%) had an acute elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, with a peak at 6 (IQR, 3-9) days. Twenty-five of 319 patients (7.8%) experienced acute kidney insufficiency, with the median time to peak creatinine level being 4 (IQR, 2-5) days after the AGEP start date. Treatments included topical corticosteroids (277 [81.5%], either alone or in combination), systemic corticosteroids (109 [32.1%]), cyclosporine (10 [2.9%]), or supportive care only (36 [10.6%]). All-cause mortality within 30 days was 3.5% (n = 12), none of which was suspected to be due to AGEP.

Conclusions and relevance: This retrospective case series evaluation of 340 patients, the largest known study cohort to date, suggests that AGEP onset is acute, is usually triggered by recent exposure to an antimicrobial, may be associated with liver or kidney complications in a minority of patients, and that discontinuation of the triggering treatment may lead to improvement or resolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ortega-Loayza reported receiving grants from Lilly; fees for serving on the advisory boards of Janssen, BMS, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and consultant fees from Genentech, Guidepoint LLC, and Techspert outside the submitted work. Dr Rosenbach reported receiving consultant fees from Merck, consulting and research grants from Processa Pharma: for the necrobiosis lipoidica clinical trial; Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Shields reported being an assistant section editor at JAMA Dermatology. Dr Noe reported receiving grants from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Dr Mostaghimi reported receiving consulting fees from Pfizer, Lilly, AbbVie, Concert, hims & hers, and Digital Diagnostics outside the submitted work; and is an associate editor, JAMA Dermatology. No other disclosures were reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sidoroff A, Halevy S, Bavinck JNB, Vaillant L, Roujeau JC. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)—a clinical reaction pattern. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28(3):113-119. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0560.2001.028003113.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szatkowski J, Schwartz RA. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): a review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(5):843-848. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hotz C, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Haddad C, et al. . Systemic involvement of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a retrospective study on 58 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(6):1223-1232. doi:10.1111/bjd.12502 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costa DAM, Seque CA, Enokihara MMSS, Porro AM. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a case series of 13 patients in Brazil. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(2):e52-e55. doi:10.1111/jdv.15175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Hotz C, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. . Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a retrospective audit of practice between 1994 and 2011 at a single centre. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1455-1457. doi:10.1111/bjd.13540 - DOI - PubMed