Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e051513.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513.

Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation

Erik M von Meyenfeldt  1   2 , Femke van Nassau  2 , Carlijn T I de Betue  3 , L Barberio  4 , Wilhelmina H Schreurs  5 , Geertruid M H Marres  3 , H Jaap Bonjer  6 , Johannes Anema  2
Affiliations

Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation

Erik M von Meyenfeldt et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands.

Setting: Lung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs.

Participants: A broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative.

Interventions: Semistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis.

Outcome measures: Determinants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands.

Results: Several determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data.

Conclusions: Based on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context.

Keywords: medical education & training; organisational development; protocols & guidelines; qualitative research; respiratory tract tumours; thoracic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ERvM reports grants from Johnson&Johnson, outside the submitted work. LB, in her capacity as director of Longkanker Nederland, reports subsidies from KWF kankerbestrijding and PGO subsidie, grants from Abbvie, grants from AMGEN, grants from Astra Zeneca, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from BM-S, grants from Janssen-Cilag, grants from MSD, grants from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, grants from Roche, grants from Takeda; all outside the submitted work. JA reports grants from Various, grants from Pfizer & ZonMw, personal grant from Dutch Social Security Agency, personal fees from Various and personal fees from Evalua LtD and Ikherstel LtD, outside the submitted work; and he was an invited co-opted member of the guideline development group for the Dutch Occupational Medicine guideline for low back pain and the Dutch national Insurance Medicine protocol for Lumbosacral syndrome. He is appointed in 2016 as president of the Work disability Prevention and Integration committee of the International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH).

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thorsteinsson H, Alexandersson A, Oskarsdottir GN. Resection rate and outcome of pulmonary resections for non – small-cell lung cancer. JTO Acquis 2012;7:1164–9. - PubMed
    1. von Meyenfeldt EM, Hoeijmakers F, Marres GMH, et al. Variation in length of stay after minimally invasive lung resection: a reflection of perioperative care routines? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;57:747–53. 10.1093/ejcts/ezz303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Meyenfeldt EM, Marres GMH, van Thiel E, et al. Variation in length of hospital stay after lung cancer surgery in the Netherlands. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;54:560–4. 10.1093/ejcts/ezy074 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang S, Li X, Li Y, et al. The long-term impact of postoperative pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:5143–52. 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources