Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:31:10.5705/ss.202019.0002.
doi: 10.5705/ss.202019.0002.

SMOOTH DENSITY SPATIAL QUANTILE REGRESSION

Affiliations

SMOOTH DENSITY SPATIAL QUANTILE REGRESSION

Halley Brantley et al. Stat Sin. 2021.

Abstract

We derive the properties and demonstrate the desirability of a model-based method for estimating the spatially-varying effects of covariates on the quantile function. By modeling the quantile function as a combination of I-spline basis functions and Pareto tail distributions, we allow for flexible parametric modeling of the extremes while preserving non-parametric flexibility in the center of the distribution. We further establish that the model guarantees the desired degree of differentiability in the density function and enables the estimation of non-stationary covariance functions dependent on the predictors. We demonstrate through a simulation study that the proposed method produces more efficient estimates of the effects of predictors than other methods, particularly in distributions with heavy tails. To illustrate the utility of the model we apply it to measurements of benzene collected around an oil refinery to determine the effect of an emission source within the refinery on the distribution of the fence line measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Example set of normalized B-spline (left) and corresponding I-spline (right) basis functions. Dotted vertical lines indicate knot locations.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Examples of quantile function (top row) and corresponding density function (bottom row) constructed using different bases.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Benzene measurements by time and location. Source locations, e1 and e2, are shown in black. Points have been jittered slightly to improve visibility.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Wind roses for different seasons.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Estimated predictor effect by quantile and location.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Spatial variation in the effect of the predictors on the 95th quantile of fenceline benzene measurements.

References

    1. Banerjee S, Gelfand AE, Finley AO, and Sang H (2008). Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 70(4):825–848. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bondell HD, Reich BJ, and Wang H (2010). Noncrossing quantile regression curve estimation. Biometrika, 97(4):825–838. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cai Y and Jiang T (2015). Estimation of non-crossing quantile regression curves. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 57(1):139–162.
    1. Davison AC and Smith RL (1990). Models for exceedances over high thresholds. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), pages 393–442.
    1. EPA (2014). Petroleum refinery sector risk and technology review and new source performance standards.

LinkOut - more resources