Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;13(12):e1189-e1195.
doi: 10.4317/jced.58707. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Evaluation of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal-F sealant retention with and without a Self-etch adhesive: A 12 month follow-up

Affiliations

Evaluation of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal-F sealant retention with and without a Self-etch adhesive: A 12 month follow-up

Gemimaa Mathew et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

Background: Pit and fissures on the young permanent tooth are ideal in harbouring dental plaque and calculus. Hence it is important to provide a preventive agent to protect against dental caries. Aim: To evaluate the retention of two different pit and fissure sealants with and without a self-etch adhesive in the first permanent molars for a period of one year.

Material and methods: 280 molars were included among 70 healthy children. According to randomisation, the groups were divided into Group IA - Embrace without Adhse One F bonding agent and Group IB - Embrace with Adhse One F bonding agent, Group IIA - Helioseal F without Adhse One F bonding agent and Group IIB - Helioseal F with Adhse One F bonding agent. The sealants were assessed clinically at 3,6,9, and 12 months using the modified Colour, Coverage, Caries (CCC) sealant evaluation system.

Results: At the end of 12 months, the retention rates of Group IB showed statistically significant results, followed by Group IIB, Group IA and Group IIA.

Conclusions: At twelve months follow-up Embrase WetBond and Helioseal-F were better retentive when used with a Adhese One F bonding agent which was statistically significant. Key words:Retention, Bonding agent, Embrace WetBond, Helioseal-F.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sundfeld RH, Croll TP, Mauro SJ, Briso AL, Alexandre RS, Sundefeld ML. Longitudinal photographic observation of the occurrence of bubbles in pit and fissure sealants. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:27–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagano T. Relation between the form of pit and fissure and primary lesion of caries. Dent Abstr. 1961;6:426.
    1. Simonsen RJ. The clinical effectiveness of a colored pit and fissure sealant at 36 months. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981;102:323–7. - PubMed
    1. Sasa I, Donly KJ. Sealants: a review of the materials and utilization. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010;38:730–4. - PubMed
    1. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD001830. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources