Disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19
- PMID: 34989148
- PMCID: PMC8855911
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4518
Disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19
Abstract
Background: Oncology rapidly shifted to telemedicine in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine can increase access to healthcare, but recent research has shown disparities exist with telemedicine use during the pandemic. This study evaluated health disparities associated with telemedicine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic among cancer patients in a tertiary care academic medical center.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated telemedicine use among adult cancer patients who received outpatient medical oncology care within a tertiary care academic healthcare system between January and September 2020. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine how telemedicine use varied by patient race/ethnicity, primary language, insurance status, and income level. We assessed geospatial links between zip-code level COVID-19 infection rates and telemedicine use.
Results: Among 29,421 patient encounters over the study period, 8,541 (29%) were delivered via telemedicine. Several groups of patients were less likely to use telemedicine, including Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.86, p = 0.03), Asian (aOR 0.79, p = 0.002), Spanish-speaking (aOR 0.71, p = 0.0006), low-income (aOR 0.67, p < 0.0001), and those with Medicaid (aOR 0.66, p < 0.0001). Lower rates of telemedicine use were found in zip codes with higher rates of COVID-19 infection. Each 10% increase in COVID-19 infection rates was associated with an 8.3% decrease in telemedicine use (p = 0.002).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates racial/ethnic, language, and income-level disparities with telemedicine use, which ultimately led patients with the highest risk of COVID-19 infection to use telemedicine the least. Additional research to better understand actionable barriers will help improve telemedicine access among our underserved populations.
Keywords: QOL; community outreach; ethical considerations; medical oncology.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
JM reports receiving compensation for consulting from Boston Consulting Group. Dr. Patel receives scientific advisory income from: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Certis, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Illumina, Merck, Pfizer, Rakuten, Tempus. Dr. Patel's university receives research funding from: Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Incyte, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Xcovery, Fate Therapeutics, Genocea, Iovance.
Figures




Comment in
-
Letter to the editor regarding "disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19".Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1556-1557. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5036. Epub 2022 Jul 15. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 35837958 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Proposed Policy, Payment, and Quality Provisions Changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2021 | CMS. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact‐sheets/proposed‐policy‐payment‐and‐qua.... Accessed January 16, 2021.
-
- 2020 State of Telemedicine Report Examining Patient Perspectives and Physician Adoption of Telemedicine Since the COVID‐19 Pandemic.
-
- Medicare Beneficiary Use of Telehealth Visits: Early Data From the Start of the COVID‐19 Pandemic. https://www.cms.gov/Research‐Statistics‐Data‐and‐Systems/Statistics‐Tren.... Accessed January 16, 2021.
-
- ASCO . A Guide to Cancer Delivery During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. 2020. https://www.asco.org/sites/new‐www.asco.org/files/content‐files/2020‐ASC.... Accessed February 24, 2021.