Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Feb 1;140(2):143-150.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5619.

Visual Outcomes Associated With Patterns of Macular Edema Resolution in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion (LEAVO) Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Visual Outcomes Associated With Patterns of Macular Edema Resolution in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion (LEAVO) Trial

Sarega Gurudas et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: It is unclear how visual outcomes vary between patterns of macular edema (ME) resolution in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Objective: To assess best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes at 100 weeks based on macular fluid resolution patterns by 52 and 100 weeks among patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for CRVO-related ME.

Design, setting, and participants: Post hoc analysis of the prospective, 3-arm, double-masked, randomized noninferiority trial Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion (LEAVO), which evaluated intravitreal aflibercept (2.0 mg/0.05 mL), bevacizumab (1.25-mg/0.05 mL), or ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) over 100 weeks in adult patients (18 years and older) with CRVO-related ME with BCVA Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 19 to 78 in the study eye (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/400 to 20/32, respectively) from December 2014 to December 2016 at 44 UK National Health Service ophthalmology departments. A total of 140 of 154 eyes were randomized to aflibercept, 144 of 154 randomized to bevacizumab, and 141 of 155 randomized to ranibizumab. Data were analyzed from January 2019 to March 2019.

Exposures: Persistent ME included eyes with central subfield thickness (CST) 320 μm or greater, and persistently dry macula (no ME) included eyes with CST less than 320 μm at 52 and 100 weeks. Recurrent ME included eyes that did not meet the criteria for persistently dry or wet. If CST was missing, the closest intervening visit was carried forward.

Main outcomes and measures: Adjusted mean BCVA at 100 weeks.

Results: The mean (SD) age of the 425 included participants was 69.2 (12.7) years, and 243 participants (57.2%) were men. A total of 425 eyes from 425 participants were included. By 100 weeks, 117 eyes (28.5%) were persistently dry, 44 (10.7%) were persistently wet (with ME), and 250 (60.8%) had recurrent ME. Persistent ME at 100 weeks was associated with worse VA compared with dry macula (adjusted difference, -10.98 ETDRS letters; 95% CI, -16.19 to -5.76; P < .001) and recurrent ME (adjusted difference, -5.39 letters; 95% CI, -10.15 to -0.64; P = .03). By 52 weeks, individuals with persistent ME also had poorer 100-week BCVA compared with individuals with dry macula (adjusted difference, -7.39; 95% CI, -11.72 to -3.05; P < .001) and recurrent ME (adjusted difference, -3.92; 95% CI, -8.05 to 0.20; P = .06). By 100 weeks, more eyes treated with bevacizumab had persistently wet macula than those treated with aflibercept (26 of 140 [18.6%] vs 7 of 134 [5.2%]; difference, 13.3%; 95% CI, 5.9 to 20.8; P < .001) or ranibizumab (11 of 137 [8%]; difference, 10.5%; 95% CI, 2.7 to 18.4; P = .01).

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that attempts should be made to maintain persistently fluid-free macula for optimal visual acuity outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Hykin reported receiving research grants, travel grants, and speaker fees from Novartis, Allergan, and Bayer and attending advisory board meetings for Novartis, Bayer, and Allergan. Dr Sivaprasad reported receiving research grants from Novartis, Bayer, Allergan, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Optos Plc; travel grants from Novartis and Bayer; speaker fees from Novartis, Bayer, and Optos Plc; and attending advisory board meetings for Novartis, Bayer, Allergan, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Optos Plc, Oxurion, Opthea, Apellis, Oculis, and Heidelberg Engineering. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Resolution in Central Subfield Thickness Across Mandated Visits by Treatment Arm
Resolution patterns based on eyes with recurrent macular edema (ME), persistent ME, and persistently dry macula by treatment arm at 100 weeks and 52 weeks.

Comment in

References

    1. Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman MB. Natural history of visual outcome in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(1):119-133.e1, 2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.04.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hykin P, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, et al. ; LEAVO Study Group . Clinical effectiveness of intravitreal therapy with ranibizumab vs aflibercept vs bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(11):1256-1264. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3305 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sen P, Gurudas S, Ramu J, et al. . Predictors of visual acuity outcomes following anti-VEGF treatment for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(11):1115-1124. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Funk M, Kriechbaum K, Prager F, et al. . Intraocular concentrations of growth factors and cytokines in retinal vein occlusion and the effect of therapy with bevacizumab. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1025-1032. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2510 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scott IU, VanVeldhuisen PC, Ip MS, et al. ; SCORE2 Investigator Group . Effect of bevacizumab vs aflibercept on visual acuity among patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the SCORE2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(20):2072-2087. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.4568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms