Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02684-y.

The dynamics of frailty development and progression in older adults in primary care in England (2006-2017): a retrospective cohort profile

Carole Fogg  1 , Simon D S Fraser  2 , Paul Roderick  2 , Simon de Lusignan  3   4 , Andrew Clegg  5 , Sally Brailsford  6 , Abigail Barkham  7 , Harnish P Patel  8   9 , Vivienne Windle  1 , Scott Harris  2 , Shihua Zhu  2 , Tracey England  1 , Dave Evenden  1 , Francesca Lambert  1 , Bronagh Walsh  10 ; Frailty Dynamics study team
Affiliations

The dynamics of frailty development and progression in older adults in primary care in England (2006-2017): a retrospective cohort profile

Carole Fogg et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a common condition in older adults and has a major impact on patient outcomes and service use. Information on the prevalence in middle-aged adults and the patterns of progression of frailty at an individual and population level is scarce. To address this, a cohort was defined from a large primary care database in England to describe the epidemiology of frailty and understand the dynamics of frailty within individuals and across the population. This article describes the structure of the dataset, cohort characteristics and planned analyses.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Participants were aged ≥50 years registered in practices contributing to the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre between 2006 to 2017. Data include GP practice details, patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, twice-yearly electronic Frailty Index (eFI), deaths, medication use and primary and secondary care health service use. Participants in each cohort year by age group, GP and patient characteristics at cohort entry are described.

Results: The cohort includes 2,177,656 patients, contributing 15,552,946 person-years, registered at 419 primary care practices in England. The mean age was 61 years, 52.1% of the cohort was female, and 77.6% lived in urban environments. Frailty increased with age, affecting 10% of adults aged 50-64 and 43.7% of adults aged ≥65. The prevalence of long-term conditions and specific frailty deficits increased with age, as did the eFI and the severity of frailty categories.

Conclusion: A comprehensive understanding of frailty dynamics will inform predictions of current and future care needs to facilitate timely planning of appropriate interventions, service configurations and workforce requirements. Analysis of this large, nationally representative cohort including participants aged ≥50 will capture earlier transitions to frailty and enable a detailed understanding of progression and impact. These results will inform novel simulation models which predict future health and service needs of older people living with frailty.

Study registration: Registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov October 25th 2019, NCT04139278 .

Keywords: Adults; Cohort study; Computer simulation modelling; Electronic health records; Frailty; Primary care; Service use; Trajectories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cohort definition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Age group distribution over cohort period
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–762. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell AJ, Buchner DM. Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty. Age Ageing. 1997;26(4):315–318. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.4.315. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguayo GA, Donneau AF, Vaillant MT, Schritz A, Franco OH, Stranges S, Malisoux L, Guillaume M, Witte DR. Agreement between 35 published frailty scores in the general population. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(4):420–434. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Caoimh R, Galluzzo L, Rodriguez-Laso A, Van der Heyden J, Ranhoff AH, Lamprini-Koula M, Ciutan M, Lopez-Samaniego L, Carcaillon-Bentata L, Kennelly S, et al. Prevalence of frailty at population level in European ADVANTAGE joint action member states: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018;54(3):226–238. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data