Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12420-1.

Military service experiences and reasons for service separation among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in a large military cohort

Felicia R Carey  1   2 , Isabel G Jacobson  3   4 , Keren Lehavot  5   6   7 , Cynthia A LeardMann  3   4 , Claire A Kolaja  3   4 , Valerie A Stander  3 , Rudolph P Rull  3
Affiliations

Military service experiences and reasons for service separation among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in a large military cohort

Felicia R Carey et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The well-being of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals is a topic of increasing concern within the military where significant institutional barriers, targeted aggression, and differential organizational policies such as "Don't Ask Don't Tell" have historically contributed to experiences of exclusion and discrimination. However, limited research has examined specific military and post-separation experiences among LGB service members and veterans. The goal of this study was to examine differences in military and service separation experiences by sexual orientation among a large representative sample of United States service members and veterans.

Methods: Survey data from the 2016 Millennium Cohort Study follow-up questionnaire were used to assess sexual orientation and multiple outcomes of interest: military experiences (morale, feelings about the military, missed workdays) and service separation experiences (reasons for separation, post-separation employment). The associations between sexual orientation (LGB versus heterosexual) and each of these outcomes were evaluated in a series of adjusted logistic regression models, stratified by sex when interactions were observed.

Results: Of the 99,599 participants, 3.4% identified as LGB. In adjusted models, LGB service members had significantly higher odds than heterosexual service members of feeling: unimpressed by the quality of unit leadership, unsupported by the military, and negative about the military overall. Bisexual women were more likely than heterosexual women to feel less unit camaraderie; both gay and bisexual men felt less camaraderie than heterosexual men. LGB veterans were more likely than heterosexual peers of the same sex to separate from service due to unplanned administrative reasons. Compared to heterosexual women, lesbian and bisexual women were more likely to separate from service due to dissatisfaction with promotions/pay and disability/medical reasons, while bisexual women specifically separated due to dissatisfaction with leadership and incompatibility with the military. Gay and bisexual men also reported separating due to incompatibility with the military, but only bisexual men were more likely to report separating due to disability/medical reasons compared to heterosexual men.

Conclusions: Less positive military- and separation-specific experiences disproportionately affected LGB service members in this study. Promoting inclusion and increasing support for LGB service members may improve satisfaction with military service and retention.

Keywords: LGB Individuals; Military Service; Millennium Cohort Study; Sexual Orientation; Veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Herek GM, Belkin A. Sexual orientation and military service: prospects for organizational and individual change in the United States. In: Britt TW, Adler AB, Castro CA, editors. Military life: the psychology of serving in peace and combat. 4. Westport: Praeger Security International; 2006. pp. 119–142.
    1. Berube A. Coming out under fire: the history of gay men and women in World War II. New York: Free Press; 1990.
    1. Brown MT. Life-course perspectives on military service. In: Wilmoth JM, London AS, editors. Military service and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender lives. New York: Routledge; 2013. pp. 97–118.
    1. Chauncey G. Christian brotherhood or sexual perversion? Homosexual identities and the construction of sexual boundaries in the World War I era. J Soc Hist. 1985;19(2):189–211.
    1. Shilts R. Conduct unbecoming: lesbians and gays in the military, Vietnam to the Persian Gulf. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1993.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources